Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36439515›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Prediction of radiation-induced acute skin toxicity in breast cancer patients using data encapsulation screening and dose-gradient-based multi-region radiomics technique: A multicenter study.

Huichun Feng, Hui Wang, Lixia Xu, Yao Ren, Qianxi Ni, Zhen Yang, Shenglin Ma, Qinghua Deng, Xueqin Chen, Bing Xia and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Huichun FengMedical Imaging and Translational Medicine Laboratory, Hangzhou Cancer Center, Hangzhou, China.
Hui WangMedical Imaging and Translational Medicine Laboratory, Hangzhou Cancer Center, Hangzhou, China.
Lixia XuMedical Imaging and Translational Medicine Laboratory, Hangzhou Cancer Center, Hangzhou, China.
Yao RenMedical Imaging and Translational Medicine Laboratory, Hangzhou Cancer Center, Hangzhou, China.
Qianxi NiDepartment of Radiology, Hunan Cancer Hospital, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Zhen YangDepartment of Radiotherapy, Xiangya Hospital Central South University, Changsha, China.
Shenglin MaMedical Imaging and Translational Medicine Laboratory, Hangzhou Cancer Center, Hangzhou, China.
Qinghua DengMedical Imaging and Translational Medicine Laboratory, Hangzhou Cancer Center, Hangzhou, China.
Xueqin ChenMedical Imaging and Translational Medicine Laboratory, Hangzhou Cancer Center, Hangzhou, China.
Bing XiaMedical Imaging and Translational Medicine Laboratory, Hangzhou Cancer Center, Hangzhou, China.
Yu KuangMedical Physics Program, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV, United States.
Xiadong LiMedical Imaging and Translational Medicine Laboratory, Hangzhou Cancer Center, Hangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Radiation-induced dermatitis is one of the most common side effects for breast cancer patients treated with radiation therapy (RT). Acute complications can have a considerable impact on tumor control and quality of life for breast cancer patients. In this study, we aimed to develop a novel quantitative high-accuracy machine learning tool for prediction of radiation-induced dermatitis (grade ≥ 2) (RD 2+) before RT by using data encapsulation screening and multi-region dose-gradient-based radiomics techniques, based on the pre-treatment planning computed tomography (CT) images, clinical and dosimetric information of breast cancer patients. Methods and Materials: 214 patients with breast cancer who underwent RT between 2018 and 2021 were retrospectively collected from 3 cancer centers in China. The CT images, as well as the clinical and dosimetric information of patients were retrieved from the medical records. 3 PTV dose related ROIs, including irradiation volume covered by 100%, 105%, and 108% of prescribed dose, combined with 3 skin dose-related ROIs, including irradiation volume covered by 20-Gy, 30-Gy, 40-Gy isodose lines within skin, were contoured for radiomics feature extraction. A total of 4280 radiomics features were extracted from all 6 ROIs. Meanwhile, 29 clinical and dosimetric characteristics were included in the data analysis. A data encapsulation screening algorithm was applied for data cleaning. Multiple-variable logistic regression and 5-fold-cross-validation gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT) were employed for modeling training and validation, which was evaluated by using receiver operating characteristic analysis. Results: The best predictors for symptomatic RD 2+ were the combination of 20 radiomics features, 8 clinical and dosimetric variables, achieving an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.998 [95% CI: 0.996-1.0] and an AUC of 0.911 [95% CI: 0.838-0.983] in the training and validation dataset, respectively, in the 5-fold-cross-validation GBDT model. Meanwhile, the top 12 most important characteristics as well as their corresponding importance measures for RD 2+ prediction in the GBDT machine learning process were identified and calculated. Conclusions: A novel multi-region dose-gradient-based GBDT machine learning framework with a random forest based data encapsulation screening method integrated can achieve a high-accuracy prediction of acute RD 2+ in breast cancer patients.

Indexed as

Breast cancergradient boosting decision treemachine learningradiation-induced skin toxicityradiation therapyradiomics

Identifiers

PMID36439515
PMCPMC9686850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.