ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022
Prediction of radiation-induced acute skin toxicity in breast cancer patients using data encapsulation screening and dose-gradient-based multi-region radiomics technique: A multicenter study.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prediction models of adverse outcomes following surgery and radiotherapy for breast cancer: a systematic review.ESMO real world data and digital oncology · 2026Review
- AI-enabled precision prediction and proactive management of cutaneous toxicities in cancer immunoradiotherapy (ICI+RT).Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Multi-Radiomics Features of Super-Resolution MRI for Predicting Minor Amputation in Wagner 3 Diabetic Foot Ulcers.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2026Article
- Article
- Dual-radiomics based on SHapley additive explanations for predicting hematologic toxicity in concurrent chemoradiotherapy patients.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Prediction of acute skin toxicity in tomotherapy of breast cancer using skin DVH data.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Breast cancer radiobiology: The renaissance of whole breast radiation fractionation (Review).Molecular and clinical oncology · 2024Review
- Utilizing radiomics and dosiomics with AI for precision prediction of radiation dermatitis in breast cancer patients.BMC cancer · 2024Article
- A dosiomics model for prediction of radiation-induced acute skin toxicity in breast cancer patients: machine learning-based study for a closed bore linac.European journal of medical research · 2024Article
- Advancing equitable and personalized cancer care: Novel applications and priorities of artificial intelligence for fairness and inclusivity in the patient care workflow.European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990) · 2024Review
- To Radiate or Not to Radiate After Breast-Conserving Surgery-Endocrine Therapy is the Question.Annals of surgical oncology · 2023Article
- Electron stream effect in 0.35 Tesla magnetic resonance image guided radiotherapy for breast cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Machine-learning prediction model for acute skin toxicity after breast radiation therapy using spectrophotometry.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Radiation-induced dermatitis is one of the most common side effects for breast cancer patients treated with radiation therapy (RT). Acute complications can have a considerable impact on tumor control and quality of life for breast cancer patients. In this study, we aimed to develop a novel quantitative high-accuracy machine learning tool for prediction of radiation-induced dermatitis (grade ≥ 2) (RD 2+) before RT by using data encapsulation screening and multi-region dose-gradient-based radiomics techniques, based on the pre-treatment planning computed tomography (CT) images, clinical and dosimetric information of breast cancer patients. Methods and Materials: 214 patients with breast cancer who underwent RT between 2018 and 2021 were retrospectively collected from 3 cancer centers in China. The CT images, as well as the clinical and dosimetric information of patients were retrieved from the medical records. 3 PTV dose related ROIs, including irradiation volume covered by 100%, 105%, and 108% of prescribed dose, combined with 3 skin dose-related ROIs, including irradiation volume covered by 20-Gy, 30-Gy, 40-Gy isodose lines within skin, were contoured for radiomics feature extraction. A total of 4280 radiomics features were extracted from all 6 ROIs. Meanwhile, 29 clinical and dosimetric characteristics were included in the data analysis. A data encapsulation screening algorithm was applied for data cleaning. Multiple-variable logistic regression and 5-fold-cross-validation gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT) were employed for modeling training and validation, which was evaluated by using receiver operating characteristic analysis. Results: The best predictors for symptomatic RD 2+ were the combination of 20 radiomics features, 8 clinical and dosimetric variables, achieving an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.998 [95% CI: 0.996-1.0] and an AUC of 0.911 [95% CI: 0.838-0.983] in the training and validation dataset, respectively, in the 5-fold-cross-validation GBDT model. Meanwhile, the top 12 most important characteristics as well as their corresponding importance measures for RD 2+ prediction in the GBDT machine learning process were identified and calculated. Conclusions: A novel multi-region dose-gradient-based GBDT machine learning framework with a random forest based data encapsulation screening method integrated can achieve a high-accuracy prediction of acute RD 2+ in breast cancer patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.