Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36439476›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Postoperative circulating tumor DNA detection is associated with the risk of recurrence in patients resected for a stage II colorectal cancer.

Adrien Grancher, Ludivine Beaussire, Sylvain Manfredi, Karine Le Malicot, Marie Dutherage, Vincent Verdier, Claire Mulot, Olivier Bouché, Jean-Marc Phelip, Charles-Briac Levaché and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Adrien GrancherNormandie Univ, UNIROUEN, Inserm U1245, IRON group, Rouen University Hospital, Normandy Centre for Genomic and Personalized Medicine and Department of Hepatogastroenterology, Rouen, France.
Ludivine BeaussireNormandie Univ, UNIROUEN, Inserm U1245, IRON group, Rouen University Hospital, Normandy Centre for Genomic and Personalized Medicine and Department of Hepatogastroenterology, Rouen, France.
Sylvain ManfrediBurgundy Digestive Cancer Registry, INSERM, Lipides, Nutrition, Cancers (LNC)-UMR1231, University Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Dijon, France.
Karine Le MalicotBurgundy Digestive Cancer Registry, INSERM, Lipides, Nutrition, Cancers (LNC)-UMR1231, University Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Dijon, France.
Marie DutherageNormandie Univ, UNIROUEN, Inserm U1245, IRON group, Rouen University Hospital, Normandy Centre for Genomic and Personalized Medicine and Department of Hepatogastroenterology, Rouen, France.
Vincent VerdierNormandie Univ, UNIROUEN, Inserm U1245, IRON group, Rouen University Hospital, Normandy Centre for Genomic and Personalized Medicine and Department of Hepatogastroenterology, Rouen, France.
Claire MulotParis University, Biology Resources Center EPIGENETEC, Paris, France.
Olivier BouchéDepartment of Digestive Oncology, University Hospital of Reims, Reims, France.
Jean-Marc PhelipDepartment of Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, University Hospital of Saint Etienne, Saint Etienne, France.
Charles-Briac LevachéDepartment of Radiotherapy and Medical Oncology, Polyclinique Francheville, Périgueux, France.
Philippe DeguiralDepartment of Gastroenterology, St Nazaire Hospital, Saint-Nazaire, France.
Sophie CoutantNormandie Univ, UNIROUEN, Inserm U1245, IRON group, Rouen University Hospital, Normandy Centre for Genomic and Personalized Medicine and Department of Hepatogastroenterology, Rouen, France.
David SefriouiNormandie Univ, UNIROUEN, Inserm U1245, IRON group, Rouen University Hospital, Normandy Centre for Genomic and Personalized Medicine and Department of Hepatogastroenterology, Rouen, France.
Jean-François EmileDepartment of Pathology, Hôpital Ambroise-Paré, Boulogne-Billancourt, France.
Pierre Laurent-PuigDepartment of Biology, Georges Pompidou Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Paris, France.
Frédéric BibeauDepartment of Pathology, Caen University Hospital, Caen, France.
Pierre MichelNormandie Univ, UNIROUEN, Inserm U1245, IRON group, Rouen University Hospital, Normandy Centre for Genomic and Personalized Medicine and Department of Hepatogastroenterology, Rouen, France.
Nasrin Sarafan-VasseurNormandie Univ, UNIROUEN, Inserm U1245, IRON group, Rouen University Hospital, Normandy Centre for Genomic and Personalized Medicine and Department of Hepatogastroenterology, Rouen, France.
Côme LepageBurgundy Digestive Cancer Registry, INSERM, Lipides, Nutrition, Cancers (LNC)-UMR1231, University Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Dijon, France.
Frederic Di FioreNormandie Univ, UNIROUEN, Inserm U1245, IRON group, Rouen University Hospital, Normandy Centre for Genomic and Personalized Medicine and Department of Hepatogastroenterology, Rouen, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is reported to be promising in localized colorectal cancer (CRC). The present study aimed to retrospectively evaluate the impact of ctDNA in patients with a resected stage II CRC from the PROGIGE 13 trial with available paired tumor and blood samples. A group of recurrent patients were matched one-to-one with nonrecurrent patients according to sex, tumor location, treatment sequence, and blood collection timing. CtDNA was analyzed by digital PCR according to NGS of tumors. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed based on ctDNA, and the risks of recurrence and death were determined. A total of 134 patients were included, with 67 patients in each group. At least one alteration was identified in 115/134 tumors. Postoperative ctDNA was detected in 10/111 (9.0%) informative samples and was detected more frequently in the recurrent group (16.7% versus 1.8%; p = 0.02). The median DFS of ctDNA+ versus ctDNA- patients was 16.8 versus 54 months (p = 0.002), respectively, and the median OS was 51.3 versus 69.5 months (p = 0.03), respectively. CtDNA was associated with recurrence (ORa = 11.13, p = 0.03) and death (HRa = 3.15, p = 0.01). In conclusion, the presence of postoperative ctDNA is associated with both recurrence and survival in stage II CRC.

Indexed as

circulating tumor DNAcolorectal cancerliquid biopsynext generation sequencingstage II

Identifiers

PMID36439476
PMCPMC9685416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.