SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2022
A systematic review of [
Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Head-to-head comparative study of [Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitor (FAPI)-Based Theranostics-Where We Are at and Where We Are Heading: A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Pooled it
- 3D-Printed prosthesis for recurrent femoral metastasis with periprosthetic infection: A case report.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2026Article
- Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitor (FAPI) PET: A Scoping Review of Emerging Oncologic and Fibroinflammatory Applications.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Comparison of diagnostic performance of [Asia Oceania journal of nuclear medicine & biology · 2025Article
- Prognostic significance ofAnnals of nuclear medicine · 2024Article
- The inferior performance of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024Article
- Comparative assessment of the diagnostic efficacy of [Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- One-stop [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to perform a systemic analysis of [ Methods: This systematic review followed the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Project (PRISMA) for systematic reviews and meta-analysis. This is a retrospective study of articles published in PubMed. Embase was searched online from the start of May 2022. The main endpoints were the maximum standardized uptake value and the tumor-to-background ratio to determine the examination performance of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 and [ Results: A total of eight studies on the metastasis of malignant tumors on bone were included, which involved 358 patients in the final analysis. Conclusion: [ Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier (CRD42022313019).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.