ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022
Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy does not improve outcomes in patients with fistula-associated anal adenocarcinoma undergoing abdominoperineal resection.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Malignant Transformation of Perianal Fistulas: A Systematic Review of the Literature.Journal of surgical oncology · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Abdominoperineal resection (APR) is currently established as a standard treatment regimen for fistula-associated anal adenocarcinoma (FAAA), however, the efficacy of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) remains unclear. The aim of this study is to evaluate the role of CRT in patients with FAAA treated with APR through single-center experience and literature review. Methods: A retrospective review was performed on patients with FAAA consecutive treated in our institution from 2005 to 2022. In addition, a systematic literature search was performed using PubMed and MEDLINE. All patients with FAAA who received APR in our institution and reported in the literature were included and divided into three categories for statistical analysis: APR alone (APR group), neoadjuvant therapy combined APR (CRT+APR group), and APR combined postoperative therapy (APR+CRT group). Results: Fifteen patients with FAAA were identified from our retrospective charts review. At a median follow-up time of 18 months, the recurrence-free survival rate was 53.3% and the survival rate was 73.3%. Eight patients underwent APR and 6 received postoperative chemotherapy. Among them, one died, one developed recurrence and the remaining six patients were alive with disease free. We found 37 publications describing 62 patients with FAAA treated with APR. Clinical data from these articles were analyzed together with the 8 cases in our institution. The overall survival rates were 94.1%, 70.8%, and 38.5% at 1-, 3-, 5-years respectively. Combining (neo)adjuvant therapy did not appear to improve outcomes in FAAA treated with APR (CRT+APR vs. APR, p=0.977; APR+CRT vs. APR, p=0.351). Lymph node involvement was shown to be significantly associated with poor outcomes by multivariate analysis (p=0.020). Conclusions: For patients with FAAA without lymph node involvement, APR is adequate to control disease and the addition of CRT does not appear to prolong survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.