Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36439151›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2022

Proposed new prognostic model using the systemic immune-inflammation index for primary central nervous system lymphoma: A prospective-retrospective multicohort analysis.

Shengjie Li, Zuguang Xia, Jiazhen Cao, Jinsen Zhang, Bobin Chen, Tong Chen, Xin Zhang, Wei Zhu, Danhui Li, Wei Hua and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Shengjie LiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Zuguang XiaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Jiazhen CaoDepartment of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Jinsen ZhangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Bobin ChenDepartment of Hematology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Tong ChenDepartment of Hematology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Xin ZhangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Wei ZhuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Danhui LiDepartment of Pathology, RenJi Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai JiaoTong University, Shanghai, China.
Wei HuaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Ying MaoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) has been considered a novel prognostic biomarker in several types of lymphoma. Our aims were to determine the best statistical relationship between pretreatment SII and survival and to combination of SII and the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center model (MSKCC) to derive the best prognostic mode in primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL). Methods: Pretreatment SII and clinical data in 174 newly diagnosed PCNSL patients were included from two retrospective discovery cohorts (n = 128) and one prospective validation cohort (n = 46). A generalized additive model, Kaplan-Meier curve, and Cox analysis were performed. The high risk versus low risk of SII-MSKCC for the PCNSL cutoff point (0-1 vs. 2-4) was determined by the minimum P-value approach. Results: The SII showed a U-shaped relationship with the risk of overall survival (OS; P = 0.006). The patients with low SII or high SII had poorer OS and progression-free survival (PFS) than those with median SII. For PFS and OS, SII-MSKCC was a better predictor than MSKCC alone. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the SII-MSKCC score was 0.84 for OS and 0.78 for PFS in the discovery cohorts. The predictive value of the SII-MSKCC score (OS, 0.88; PFS, 0.95) was verified through the validation cohort. Multivariable Cox analysis and Kaplan-Meier curve showed excellent performance for SII-MSKCC, with significant separation of two groups and better performance than MSKCC alone. Conclusions: We propose a new prognostic model using SII, age, and Karnofsky score that outperforms MSKCC alone and enables individualized estimates of patient outcome.

Indexed as

LymphomaNeutrophilsCentral Nervous SystemHumansInflammationPrognosisRetrospective StudiesbiomarkerMSKCCprimary central nervous system lymphomaprognosisSystemic immune-inflammation index

Identifiers

PMID36439151
PMCPMC9681794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.