Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36439135›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in immunology2022

Vedolizumab for acute gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Allen Cheng-Wei Li, Chen Dong, Soon-Tzeh Tay, Ashwin Ananthakrishnan, Kevin Sheng-Kai Ma

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Begelomab (BEGESANDJournal of clinical medicine · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Graft-Versus-Host Disease Mouse Models: A Clinical-Translational Perspective.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Review
  11. Modern-Era Challenges in the Clinical Management of Graft-Versus-Host Disease.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Allen Cheng-Wei LiSchool of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Chen DongSchool of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Soon-Tzeh TayDepartment of Medical Education, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Ashwin AnanthakrishnanDivision of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Kevin Sheng-Kai MaDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States.
Massachusetts General Hospital · USChang Gung Memorial Hospital · TWChung Shan Medical University · TWChung Shan Medical University Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To determine the safety and efficacy of vedolizumab for the prophylaxis and treatment of gastrointestinal involvement of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) (GI-aGVHD). Methods: Literature search within PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library for observational studies and clinical trials that evaluated the effect of vedolizumab on GI-aGVHD was done through 17 May 2022. A bivariate and random-effect meta-analysis derived the pooled observational percentages and pooled risk ratios (RRs) from baseline of primary endpoints including overall response, complete response, mortality, and adverse events. Results: There was a total of 122 participants in eight eligible studies, including one study on the prophylactic use of vedolizumab and seven studies on vedolizumab for the treatment of GI-aGVHD. Of seven studies that reported details on baseline grades of GI-aGVHD, a total of 47 patients (47.95%) were of stage 4, 31 patients (31.63%) were of stage 3, 10 patients (10.2%) were of stage 2, and 10 patients (10.2%) were of stage 1. The use of vedolizumab for the treatment of GI-aGVHD yielded a significantly improved objective response rate (ORR) at 14 days (pooled ORR = 60.53%, pooled RR = 14.14, 95% CI: 2.95-67.71), 28 days (pooled ORR = 50%, RR = 7.36, 95% CI = 2.14-25.37), and 12 months (pooled ORR = 76.92%, RR = 13.66, 95% CI = 3.5-53.35) from baseline. Likewise, the use of vedolizumab was followed by a significantly improved complete response (CR) at 12 months (pooled CR = 27.27%, RR = 5.50, 95% CI = 1.01-29.95), yet the CR at 14 days and 28 days did not reach statistical significance. Fifty-seven out of 87 (pooled overall survival, OS = 34.5%) and 46 out of 65 (pooled OS = 29.2%) patients expired at 6 and 12 months after the use of vedolizumab, respectively. Prophylactic use of vedolizumab was not associated with any specific type of reported adverse events, while patients with GI-aGVHD on vedolizumab presented with significantly increased risks of adverse events including infections (RR = 7.55) and impaired metabolism or nutritional complications (RR = 9.00). All analyses were of a low heterogeneity (all I-squares = 0%). Conclusion: Vedolizumab was safe and effective for the prophylaxis and management of early grade GI-aGVHD. More clinical evidence is warranted to validate these findings. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=345584, identifier CRD42022345584.

Indexed as

Graft vs Host DiseaseHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansRemission Inductionacute GVHDalpha-4-beta-7 integrinsbiologicsgraft-versus-host diseasevedolizumab

Identifiers

PMID36439135
PMCPMC9692080
OpenAlexW4308939563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.