ArticleHealth science reports2022
Penicillin V prophylaxis uptake among children living with sickle cell disease in a specialist sickle cell clinic in Ghana: A cross-sectional study.
Article in Health science reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Penicillin V prophylaxis uptake among children living with sickle cell disease in a specialist sickle cell clinic in Ghana: A cross-sectional study.Health science reports · 2022Article
- Integrating comprehensive care in the management of sickle cell disease patients in Nigeria.Hematology, transfusion and cell therapyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Background and Aims: Penicillin V prophylaxis protects children living with sickle cell disease (SCD) from bacteria infections especially Methods: The study employed an analytical cross-sectional design in the assessment of penicillin V prophylaxis adherence using both urine assay and self-reported methods. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to determine the factors associated with penicillin V prophylaxis adherence. A Results: Among the 421 SCD patients recruited, penicillin V prophylaxis adherence was observed to be 30.0% and 68.0% for the objective and subjective methods of assessment, respectively. For the objective method of assessment, being cared for by grandparents increased the odds of penicillin V adherence (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 3.68, confidence interval [CI] = 1.03-13.15). However, SCD patients within the ages of 10-14 years (aOR = 0.36, CI = 0.17-0.80), >14 years (aOR = 0.17, CI = 0.05-0.61), SCD patient cared for by married caregivers/parents (aOR = 0.32, CI = 0.14-0.72), SCD patient cared for by divorced caregivers/parents (aOR = 0.23, CI = 0.07-0.75), SCD patients taking homemade (herbal) preparations for the treatment of SCD (aOR = 0.42, CI = 0.21-0.83), and inappropriate intake of penicillin V prophylaxis (aOR = 0.27, CI = 0.11-0.67) reduced the odds of penicillin V adherence. For the subjective method of assessment, taking homemade preparation (herbal) for the treatment of SCD (aOR = 0.52, CI = 0.30-0.89) and inappropriate intake of penicillin V (aOR = 0.32, CI = 0.17-0.60) reduced the odds of penicillin V adherence. Conclusion: This study reports a relatively low adherence rate of penicillin V prophylaxis among children living with SCD. Educating and counseling both SCD patients and/or caregivers on the need to be adherent to penicillin V prophylaxis could prevent complications that may arise from nonadherence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.