Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36438856›Full record

ArticleMethodsX2022

A high throughput proliferation and cytotoxicity assay for co-cultured isogenic cell lines.

Syed Ahmad, Kris C Wood, John E Scott

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MethodsX, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Syed AhmadDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Biomanufacturing Research Institute and Technology Enterprise (BRITE), North Carolina Central University, Durham, NC, United States.
Kris C WoodDepartment of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
John E ScottDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Biomanufacturing Research Institute and Technology Enterprise (BRITE), North Carolina Central University, Durham, NC, United States.
North Carolina Central University · USDuke University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PTEN is a well-known tumor suppressor that is inactivated or suppressed at a high frequency in cancer. We sought an assay to screen compounds for ones that differentially inhibited proliferation or induced cytotoxicity in PTEN mutated cancer cells. We employed the isogenic pair of cell lines MCF10-A breast cell line (wild type, WT) and the same cell line with PTEN knocked out (KO) by CRISPR. We sought an assay where these PTEN WT and KO isogenic cell lines were co-cultured in the same well for compound testing. The KO cell line, but not the WT, was tagged with the red fluorescent protein mKate2. We employed a real time microscopic imaging instrument to identify cell populations in co-culture based on red fluorescence to obtain a cell count for each cell line. To acquire cytotoxicity data for each population, the dye CellTox Green was added to the media. To assess the assay, we determined the concentration response of paclitaxel. In order to assess the potential for screening, we performed mock screening in 384-well plate format. Thus, we developed a high throughput co-culture cell cytotoxicity and proliferation assay method that could be employed for any pair of cell lines to identify selective compounds.

Indexed as

CancerIsogenicPTEN

Identifiers

PMID36438856
PMCPMC9692025
OpenAlexW4309341410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.