Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36438781›Full record

Observational studyTransplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation2022

Neo-Adjuvant Use of Sorafenib for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Awaiting Liver Transplantation.

Kate Minoux, Guillaume Lassailly, Massih Ningarhari, Henri Lubret, Medhi El Amrani, Valérie Canva, Stéphanie Truant, Philippe Mathurin, Alexandre Louvet, Gilles Lebuffe and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Kate MinouxCHU Lille, Department of Hepatogastroenterology, Lille, France.
Guillaume LassaillyCHU Lille, Department of Hepatogastroenterology, Lille, France.
Massih NingarhariCHU Lille, Department of Hepatogastroenterology, Lille, France.
Henri LubretCHU Lille, Department of Hepatogastroenterology, Lille, France.
Medhi El AmraniCHU Lille, Department of Digestive Surgery and Transplantation, University of Lille, Lille, France.
Valérie CanvaCHU Lille, Department of Hepatogastroenterology, Lille, France.
Stéphanie TruantCHU Lille, Department of Digestive Surgery and Transplantation, University of Lille, Lille, France.
Philippe MathurinCHU Lille, Department of Hepatogastroenterology, Lille, France.
Alexandre LouvetCHU Lille, Department of Hepatogastroenterology, Lille, France.
Gilles LebuffeCHU Lille, Department of Anesthesiology, Resuscitation, and Critical Care Anesthesiology, University of Lille, Lille, France.
Odile GoriaCHU Rouen, Department of Hepatogastroenterology, Hôpital Charles Nicolle, Rouen, France.
Eric Nguyen-KhacCHU Amiens-Picardie, Hôpital Sud, Department of Hepatogastroenterology, Amiens, France.
Emmanuel BoleslawskiCHU Lille, Department of Digestive Surgery and Transplantation, University of Lille, Lille, France.
Sebastien DharancyCHU Lille, Department of Hepatogastroenterology, Lille, France.
Université de Lille · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille · FRLille’s Cardiology Hospital · FRGroupe de Recherche sur l'Alcool et les Pharmacodépendances · FRInserm · FRUniversité de Rouen Normandie · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Data on efficacy and safety of sorafenib in a neoadjuvant setting for HCC awaiting liver transplantation (LT) are heterogeneous and scarce. We aimed to investigate the trajectory of patients treated with sorafenib while awaiting LT. All patients listed for HCC and treated with sorafenib were included in a monocentric observational study. A clinical and biological evaluation was performed every month. Radiological tumor response evaluation was realized every 3 months on the waiting list and every 6 months after LT. Among 327 patients listed for HCC, 62 (19%) were treated with Sorafenib. Sorafenib was initiated for HCC progression after loco-regional therapy (LRT) in 50% of cases and for impossibility of LRT in 50% of cases. The mean duration of treatment was 6 months. Thirty six patients (58%) dropped-out for tumor progression and 26 (42%) patients were transplanted. The 5-year overall and recurrent-free survival after LT was 77% and 48% respectively. Patients treated for impossibility of LRT had acceptable 5-year intention-to-treat overall and post-LT survivals. Conversely, patients treated for HCC progression presented high dropout rate and low intention-to-treat survival. Our results suggest that it is very questionable in terms of utility that patients treated for HCC progression should even be kept listed once the tumor progression has been observed.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularLiver NeoplasmsLiver TransplantationHumansNeoadjuvant TherapySorafenibSorafenibcancercancer-therapeuticshepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)liver transplantationneoadjuvant therapysorafenibtyrosine kinase inhibitor

Identifiers

PMID36438781
PMCPMC9681796
OpenAlexW4308566715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.