ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2022
Comparing meat abstainers with avid meat eaters and committed meat reducers.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Preferences for Meat and Meat Alternatives in Different Meal Scenarios: A Dutch Discrete Choice Experiment.Current developments in nutrition · 2026Article
- Farm Animal Welfare on the Mind and Meat in the Diet: Who Are These Consumers?Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Expected Liking of and Emotional Responses to Alternative Protein Burger Patties Among a Convenience Sample of UK Meat Eaters.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Novel Plant and fungi-based Alternatives Support Nutritional Adequacy of Diets and Reduce Their Environmental Impacts.Current developments in nutrition · 2026Article
- Perspectives of individuals on reducing meat consumption to mitigate climate change - a scoping review.BMC nutrition · 2025Article
- Education and Meat Consumption and Reduction: The Mediating Role of Climate Literacy.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Association of Meat Attachment with Intention to Reduce Meat Consumption Among Young Adults: Moderating Role of Environmental Attitude.Nutrients · 2025Article
- Predictors of Meat Reduction: The Case of Slovenia.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Red and Red Processed Meat Consumption Behaviors in Scottish Adults.Current developments in nutrition · 2024Article
- Effects of Different Nutritional Patterns and Physical Activity on Body Composition: A Gender and Age Group Comparative Study.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Food availability, perceived food environment and social norm perceptions of healthy and vegetarian food consumption at a public music festival in the Netherlands: a cross-sectional study.BMJ nutrition, prevention & health · 2024Article
- Understanding and tackling meat reduction in different cultural contexts: a segmentation study of Swiss and Vietnamese consumers.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- Sustainability Perception of Italian Consumers: Is it Possible to Replace Meat, and What Is the Best Alternative?Nutrients · 2023Article
- Meat Consumption and Availability for Its Reduction by Health and Environmental Concerns: A Pilot Study.Nutrients · 2023Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Shifting our eating patterns toward less animal-based and more plant-based diets is urgently needed to counter climate change, address public health issues, and protect animal welfare. Although most consumers agree that these are important topics, many consumers are not particularly willing to decrease the meat intensity of their diets. In supporting consumers to shift their diets, it is important to understand consumers' attitudes, motivations, and preferences related to meat consumption and to take differences across consumers on these aspects into account. This study aims to in-depth research meat abstainers (vegetarians and vegans), and to explore how and to what extent they differ from avid meat eaters and committed meat reducers in terms of their (1) socio-demographic characteristics, (2) attitudes and norms, (3) food choice motives, and (4) food preferences and behavior. A survey has been conducted among a representative sample of Dutch adults. Comparisons show that meat abstainers (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.