Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36438529›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine

Attributes of Standard Treatment Guidelines in Clinical Settings and Public Health Facilities in India.

Chandrakant Lahariya, Sangeeta Sharma, Manohar Agnani, Hilde de Graeve, Jitnedra Nath Srivastava, Henk Bekedam

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chandrakant LahariyaWorld Health Organization (WHO) Country Office for India, New Delhi, India.
Sangeeta SharmaInstitute of Human Behaviour and Allied Sciences (IHBAS) and Delhi Society for Promotion of Rational Use of Drugs (DSPRUD), Delhi, India.
Manohar AgnaniNational Health Mission, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Govt of India, New Delhi, India.
Hilde de GraeveWorld Health Organization (WHO) Country Office for India, New Delhi, India.
Jitnedra Nath SrivastavaNational Health Systems Resource Centre, MoHFW, Govt of India, India.
Henk BekedamWorld Health Organization (WHO) Country Office for India, New Delhi, India.
World Health Organization - India · IN

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Standard Treatment Guidelines (STGs) are time-tested tool to improve healthcare quality and patient safety. This study was done to review the available guidelines and assess their essential attributes using AGREE reporting checklist 2016. Methods: Publications from PubMed, World Health Organization, Global Health Regional Libraries, Index Medicus, Google, Google Scholar, and insurers, state/central government portals were searched. Results: In total, 241 STGs met the inclusion criteria. A range of developers with a varying focus and priorities developed these guidelines (government mostly under national programs 134 (56%); professional associations 67 (28%), academic/research institutions 36 (15%); international agencies 4 [2%]). The government-led guidelines focused on program operations (mainly infections, maternal, and childcare), whereas insurers focused on surgical procedures for protection against fraudulent intentions for claims. The available STGs varied largely in terms of development process rigor, end-user involvement, updation, applicability, etc.; 12% guidelines developed documented GRADE criteria for evidence. Most guidelines focused on the primary care, and only 27 and 7% included treatment at tertiary and secondary levels, respectively, focused on general practitioners. Conclusion: There is a need for coordinated, and collaborative efforts to generate evidence-based guidelines, facilitate periodic revisions, standardized development process, and the standards for monitoring embedded in the guidelines. A single designated authority for the standard treatment guidelines development and a central web-based repository with free access for clinicians/users will ensure wide access to quality guidelines enhancing acceptance and stewardship.

Indexed as

Indiapublic healthquality of carestandard treatment guidelinesuniversal health coverage

Identifiers

PMID36438529
PMCPMC9693950
OpenAlexW4310461037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.