ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2022
A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial of Early Ambulation after Groin Reconstruction with Sartorius Muscle Flaps.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of muscle flaps, such as the sartorius muscle, for groin coverage in high-risk vascular patients has been shown to reduce complication rates. However, it remains unknown whether earlier postoperative ambulation is associated with improved postoperative outcomes for groin muscle flaps following infrainguinal vascular surgery. Methods: We performed a pilot randomized trial to analyze the effect of early ambulation on postoperative outcomes in patients who had groin reconstruction with sartorius muscle flaps following infrainguinal vascular surgery at our academic institution. Results: Fourteen patients were randomized to standard ambulation (on postoperative day 6), and 14 patients were randomized to early ambulation (on postoperative day 2). The treatment arms were similar with respect to age, body mass index, risk category, smoking status, and comorbidities. Median length of stay was 6 days in the early group versus 7 days in the standard group. Immediate and long-term physical function and general health were better in the early group There were slightly more wound complications in the standard (57.1%) versus the early group (42.9%), and the early group had more lymphatic complications (35.7% versus 14.3%). Conclusions: The decision to ambulate a patient after this surgery continues to be a decision between the vascular and plastic surgeons. However, this pilot trial has shown the safety profile of early ambulation and that it should be considered for specific patients. Additionally, this trial has provided valuable information for performing a larger scale randomized controlled trial to determine the optimal postoperative protocol for patients with these reconstructions.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.