Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36438457›Full record

ReviewTelematics and informatics2023

Do social media campaigns foster vaccination adherence? A systematic review of prior intervention-based campaigns on social media.

Young Anna Argyris, Victoria R Nelson, Kaleigh Wiseley, Ruoyu Shen, Alexa Roscizewski

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Telematics and informatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Young Anna ArgyrisDepartment of Media & Information, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States.
Victoria R NelsonDepartment of Advertising and Public Relations, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States.
Kaleigh WiseleyDepartment of Media & Information, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States.
Ruoyu ShenDepartment of Media & Information, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States.
Alexa RoscizewskiDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, WI, United States.

Funding

Development of a vaccine informatics system and its application to identifying the impact of vaccine debate on immunization rates during a global pandemicR21LM013638 · NLM · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ARGYRIS, YOUNG ANNA, TAN, PANG-NING · 2021 to 2022
$348k
NLM NIH HHS R21 LM013638
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has demonstrated the importance of large-scale campaigns to facilitate vaccination adherence. Social media presents unique opportunities to reach broader audiences and reduces the costs of conducting national or global campaigns aimed at achieving herd immunity. Nonetheless, few studies have reviewed the effectiveness of prior social media campaigns for vaccination adherence, and several prior studies have shown that social media campaigns do not increase uptake rates. Hence, our objective is to conduct a systematic review to examine the effectiveness of social media campaigns and to identify the reasons for the mixed results of prior studies. Our methodology began with a search of seven databases, which resulted in the identification of 92 interventions conducted over digital media. Out of these 92 studies, only 15 adopted social media campaigns for immunization. We analyzed these 15 studies, along with a coding scheme we developed based on reviews of both health interventions and social media campaigns. Multiple coders, who were knowledgeable about social media campaigns and healthcare, analyzed the 15 cases and obtained an acceptable level of inter-coder reliability (> .80). The results from our systematic review show that only a few social media campaigns have succeeded in enhancing vaccination adherence. In addition, few campaigns have utilized known critical success factors of social media to induce vaccination adherence. Based on these findings, we discuss a set of research questions that informatics scholars should consider when identifying opportunities for using social media to resolve one of the most resilient challenges in public health. Finally, we conclude by discussing how the insights drawn from our systematic reviews contribute to advancing theories, such as social influence and the health belief model, into the realm of social media-based health interventions.

Indexed as

CONSORT, Consolidated Standards of Reporting TrialsDigital healthHPV, Human PapillomavirusInterventionsMeSH, Medical Subject HeadingsMMR, measles, mumps, and rubellaSocial media campaignsSystematic reviewVaccines

Identifiers

PMID36438457
PMCPMC9675434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.