ArticleRisk management and healthcare policy2022
Complexity of Decision-Making!: Case Studies of Cadaveric Organ Donations in Ahmedabad, India.
Article in Risk management and healthcare policy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Determinants of next-of-kin consent in corneal donation: A retrospective study from eastern India.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- The gift of life: Understanding the experiences of organ donor families.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2025Article
- Explanation of the sociological patterns of organ donation: An analytical study.Journal of education and health promotion · 2024Article
- Challenges and Motivators to Organ Donation: A Qualitative Exploratory Study in Gujarat, India.International journal of general medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The disequilibrium in the demand-supply nexus of organ donation prevails an urgent need for understanding the process and cascade of the donation. There is a lack of evidence in organ donation literature within India that focuses on factors influencing familial consent, the decision-making process, and psychosocial factors that can predict successful organ donation. Such evidence can assist in designing interventions and policy dialogue focusing on the discussion on enhancing donation decisions with relatives. Thus, the present study is an effort to document the decision-making complexity systematically among successful cadaveric organ donation cases. Methods: A qualitative exploratory, including the network assessment was implemented between October 2021 and February 2022 in one of the western states of India, Gujarat. A semi-structured interview guide that was comprised of thematic, open-ended questions focused on understanding the network for the decision-making process was prepared, and trained interviewers conducted the interview at the suitable place of the donor's relative. Results: The 10 interviews among the closest relatives of the deceased were conducted and the decision-making process indicated the involvement of multiple actors. The social network analysis reveals a minimum node of 2 to 7, with the highest ties of 22. The maximal degree was 3.6, and the density of 1 of these networks. Out of 10, in most cases, the ties were more than 2, with a maximum of 22 ties, which shows that more people communicated to each other before the final decision-making. Conclusion: The analysis indicates that the decision-making for deceased organ donation is a complex process as in most cases, multiple family members were involved and interaction happened before the final decision-making. The study explains the decision-making during the cadaveric organ donation process by exploring families' experiences. Further research is recommended to generate evidence on the factors and the family dynamics, including the complexity of successful organ donation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.