Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36438342›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2022

Effect of semantic distance on learning structured query language: An empirical study.

Shin-Shing Shin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Shin-Shing ShinDepartment of Information Science and Management Systems, National Taitung University, Taitung, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Students of database courses usually encounter difficulties in learning structured query language (SQL). Numerous studies have been conducted to improve how students learn SQL. However, learning SQL remains difficult. This study analyzed the difficulties in learning SQL from the viewpoint of semantic distance by using semantic network theory. An experiment involving a database course was performed to assess the influence of semantic distance on learners' understanding of SQL. The participants were requested to perform a query-writing task at the end of the course to investigate their understanding of SQL. The data analysis results indicated that the participants developed a better understanding of the formulation-to-planning transformation than the planning-to-coding transformation. This implies that the semantic distance of the planning-to-coding transformation is greater than that of the formulation-to-planning transformation, and the semantic distance of the planning-to-coding transformation is attributable to the semantic transformation from natural language to SQL, which are two essentially different languages and belong to different knowledge categories. Accordingly, this study concludes that SQL learning difficulties can mainly be ascribed to the planning-to-coding transformation because the large semantic distance. The findings suggest that SQL instructions should emphasize the semantic mapping of the planning-to-coding transformation by incorporating materials related to the transformation and should shorten the semantic distance involved in learning SQL. These two principles can be used to evaluate the effectiveness of SQL teaching methods in assisting SQL learning, and motivate researchers to develop more effective teaching methods from the viewpoint of semantic distance.

Indexed as

learningsemantic distancesemantic network theorysemantic transformationstructured query language

Identifiers

PMID36438342
PMCPMC9682009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.