Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36438313›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2022

The work design contribution to educational workers' sustainable wellbeing and performance patterns.

Amalia Raquel Pérez-Nebra, Brenda Soares Viana, Eva Lira, Pilar Martín-Hernandez, María Luisa Gracia-Pérez, Marta Gil-Lacruz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Amalia Raquel Pérez-NebraSocial Capital and Wellbeing Research Group (BYCS), Department of Psychology and Sociology, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
Brenda Soares VianaDepartment of Management, University of Brasília, Brasília, Brazil.
Eva LiraSocial Capital and Wellbeing Research Group (BYCS), Department of Psychology and Sociology, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
Pilar Martín-HernandezSocial Capital and Wellbeing Research Group (BYCS), Department of Psychology and Sociology, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
María Luisa Gracia-PérezSocial Capital and Wellbeing Research Group (BYCS), Department of Psychology and Sociology, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
Marta Gil-LacruzSocial Capital and Wellbeing Research Group (BYCS), Department of Psychology and Sociology, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
Universidad de Zaragoza · ESUniversidade de Brasília · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brazilian education faces difficulties relating to performance and illness, suggesting that the characteristics of the work can affect both variables. This study aims to describe the work characteristics that increase the odds of having happy-productive patterns in education workers. A total of 4,598 employees of the Secretariat of Education of the Federal District (SEEDF) participated in the research, answering questionnaires about work design (Brazilian version, with 18 factors), wellbeing (containing three factors), and performance. The results showed that task, social, and contextual characteristics increase the probability of being in the happy-productive pattern, and specifically, Social Support, Feedback from Others, Task Significance, Task Identity, and Autonomy, in this order, should be considered for intervention purposes.

Indexed as

elementary schoolhappy-productive workersocial supportteacherswellbeingwork characteristicswork design

Identifiers

PMID36438313
PMCPMC9682959
OpenAlexW4308650348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.