Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36438309›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2022

Enhance or inhibit? Unveiling the influence of chairman's hometown attachment on the corporate philanthropy-Corporate financial performance relationship.

Limin Chen, Xuelin Bu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Limin ChenSchool of Economics and Management, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Xuelin BuSchool of Economics and Management, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although there have been numerous studies on the relationship between corporate philanthropy and corporate financial performance (CFP), theoretical analysis focusing on the legitimacy-based mechanism and the moderating role of key executives' psychological characteristics is scarce. Hometown attachment is a special form of place attachment in environmental psychology, which reflects people's psychological attachment to their hometown and the state of maintaining an intimate emotional connection with it. Based on Scott's three-pillar institutional perspective, this study traces its origins from the Chinese cultural context, and discusses the legitimacy basis of donations in the Chinese cultural context and why donations can improve CFP. On this basis, the moderating effect of the chairman's hometown attachment on the corporate donation-performance relationship is empirically tested. Through logical deduction, hometown attachment may form legitimacy pressure to weaken the above relationship or leverage more legitimacy resources to strengthen such a relationship. Which effect dominates? The empirical results in this study of A-share listed firms from 2009 to 2018 show that the moderating role of hometown attachment is more in line with the resource theory than the former pressure theory. Further research shows that the government and consumers are important providers of these legitimacy resources. This study reveals the mechanism for legitimacy acquisition through corporate donations in the Chinese context and answers the question of what the chairman's hometown attachment brings about to their donation performance, providing some inspiration for practice.

Indexed as

Chinese contextcorporate financial performancecorporate philanthropyculturehometown attachmentinstitutional legitimacy

Identifiers

PMID36438309
PMCPMC9682063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.