Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36438293›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2022

The public and patient involvement imperative in Ireland: Building on policy drivers.

Meghan Gilfoyle, Anne MacFarlane, Ailish Hannigan, Vikram Niranjan, Zoe Hughes, Jon Salsberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A scoping review of patient and public involvement in empirical stroke research.International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Meghan GilfoylePublic and Patient Involvement Research Unit, School of Medicine, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Anne MacFarlanePublic and Patient Involvement Research Unit, School of Medicine, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Ailish HanniganPublic and Patient Involvement Research Unit, School of Medicine, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Vikram NiranjanSchool of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Zoe HughesCare Alliance Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Jon SalsbergPublic and Patient Involvement Research Unit, School of Medicine, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.

Funding

CIHR FDN #143237
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

What can we learn from the history of Public and Patient Involvement (PPI) in healthcare and research across global jurisdictions? Depending on region and context, the terminology and heritage of involvement in research vary. In this paper, we draw on global traditions to explore dominant themes and key considerations and critiques pertaining to PPI in order to inform a PPI culture shift in Ireland. We then describe the heritage of PPI in Ireland and present the case for combining methodological imperatives with policy drivers to support and encourage

Indexed as

Patient ParticipationPolicyHumansIrelandResearch Personnelco-designcommunity-based participatory research (CBPR)health service researchmeaningful involvementmethodologicalparticipatory health researchpolicypublic and patient involvement (PPI)

Identifiers

PMID36438293
PMCPMC9684639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.