ArticleFrontiers in public health2022
Investigation of small lung lesion detection for lung cancer screening in low dose FDG PET imaging by deep neural networks.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identifying a Critical Blind Spot: How Commercial AI (CAD) Systems Fail to Detect Faint Ground-Glass Opacities at -730 HU on Low-Dose CT.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Scanner-integrated reconstruction versus post-processing deep learning for low-countEJNMMI physics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: FDG PET imaging is often recommended for the diagnosis of pulmonary nodules after indeterminate low dose CT lung cancer screening. Lowering FDG injecting is desirable for PET imaging. In this work, we aimed to investigate the performance of a deep learning framework in the automatic diagnoses of pulmonary nodules at different count levels of PET imaging. Materials and methods: Twenty patients with 18F-FDG-avid pulmonary nodules were included and divided into independent training (60%), validation (20%), and test (20%) subsets. We trained a convolutional neural network (ResNet-50) on original DICOM images and used ImageNet pre-trained weight to fine-tune the model. Simulated low-dose PET images at the 9 count levels (20 × 10 Results: The AUC values were >0.98 for all count levels except for 0.5 and 0.25 million true counts (0.975 (CL 95%, 0.953-0.992) and 0.963 (CL 95%, 0.941-0.982), respectively). The AUC values were 0.941(CL 95%, 0.923-0.956), 0.993(CL 95%, 0.990-0.996) and 0.998(CL 95%, 0.996-0.999) for different groups of lesion size with effective diameter (R) <10 mm, 10-20 mm, and >20 mm, respectively. The count limit for achieving high AUC (≥0.96) for lesions with size Conclusion: All of the above results suggest that the proposed deep learning based method may detect small lesions <10 mm at an effective radiation dose <0.1 mSv. Advances in knowledge: We investigated the advantages and limitations of a fully automated lung cancer detection method based on deep learning models for data with different lesion sizes and different count levels, and gave guidance for clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.