Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36438255›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2022

A moodle course to substitute resuscitation teaching in a medical curriculum during the COVID-19 pandemic: A prospective pilot study.

Florian Ettl, Christoph Schriefl, Jürgen Grafeneder, Dominik Gabriel Thallner, Matthias Mueller, Eva Fischer, Raphael Schlegel, Thorsten Sigmund, Michael Holzer, Sebastian Schnaubelt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Florian EttlDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Christoph SchrieflDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Jürgen GrafenederDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Dominik Gabriel ThallnerDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Matthias MuellerDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Eva FischerDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Raphael SchlegelDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Thorsten SigmundDepartment of IT-Systems and Communications, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Michael HolzerDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Sebastian SchnaubeltDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Face-to-face medical education was restricted during the COVID-19 pandemic, leading to alternative teaching methods. Moodle Methods: Medical students in the eighth semester took part in a Moodle Results: Out of 594 students, who were enrolled in the online course, 531 could be included in this study. The median percentage of correctly answered multiple-choice test questions increased after completing the course [78.9%, interquartile range ( Conclusion: The Moodle

Indexed as

COVID-19Students, MedicalCurriculumEducational MeasurementFemaleHumansMalePandemicsPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesCOVID-19distance learningmedical educationonline educationonline learningpandemicresuscitationteaching

Identifiers

PMID36438255
PMCPMC9691759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.