Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36438233›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2022

Measurement of burnout during the prolonged pandemic in the Chinese zero-COVID context: COVID-19 burnout views scale.

Sam S S Lau, Cherry C Y Ho, Rebecca C K Pang, Susan Su, Heather Kwok, Sai-Fu Fung, Roger C Ho

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sam S S LauResearch Centre for Environment and Human Health, School of Continuing Education, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, China.
Cherry C Y HoResearch Centre for Environment and Human Health, School of Continuing Education, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, China.
Rebecca C K PangResearch Centre for Environment and Human Health, School of Continuing Education, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, China.
Susan SuResearch Centre for Environment and Human Health, School of Continuing Education, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, China.
Heather KwokResearch Centre for Environment and Human Health, School of Continuing Education, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, China.
Sai-Fu FungDepartment of Social and Behavioural Sciences, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Roger C HoDepartment of Psychological Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Hong Kong Baptist University · HKCity University of Hong Kong · HKNational University of Singapore · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Burnout is an important public health issue at times of the COVID-19 pandemic. Current measures which focus on work-based burnout have limitations in length and/or relevance. When stepping into the post-pandemic as a new Norm Era, the burnout scale for the general population is urgently needed to fill the gap. This study aimed to develop a COVID-19 Burnout Views Scale (COVID-19 BVS) to measure burnout views of the general public in a Chinese context and examine its psychometric properties. A multiphase approach including literature review, expert consultation, and pilot testing was adopted in developing the scale. The scale was administered to a sample of 1,078 of the general public in Hong Kong with an average age of 34.45 years (SD = 12.47). Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analyses suggested a 5-item unidimensional model of COVID-19 BVS. The CFA results indicated that the COVID-19 BVS had a good model fit, as χ2 (10.054)/5 = 2.01, SRM

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsAdultAsian PeopleBurnout, PsychologicalHong KongHumansburnoutChineseinstrument developmentmeasurepsychometric testingvalidation

Identifiers

PMID36438233
PMCPMC9686433
OpenAlexW4308870576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.