Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36438208›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2022

Cervical cancer screening uptake: A randomized controlled trial assessing the effect of sending invitation letters to non-adherent women combined with sending their general practitioners a list of their non-adherent patients (study protocol).

Delphine Teigné, Anne-Sophie Banaszuk, Charlotte Grimault, Linda Abes, Aurélie Gaultier, Cédric Rat

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04689178 (Cervical Cancer Screening Uptake), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04689178 naunknown statusnot on this map

Cervical Cancer Screening Uptake: A Randomised Controlled Trial Assessing the Effect of Sending Invitation Letters to Nonadherent Women Combined With Sending Their General Practitioners a List of Their Nonadherent Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorNantes University HospitalRan2021 to 2023Enrolled195,000ConditionsCervical CancerArmsInvitation letter + GP reminder, Invitation letter
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Delphine TeignéGeneral Practice Department, Faculty of Médecine, Nantes, France.
Anne-Sophie BanaszukRegional Organization in Charge of Cancer Screening Programmes, Angers, France.
Charlotte GrimaultGeneral Practice Department, Faculty of Médecine, Nantes, France.
Linda AbesGeneral Practice Department, Faculty of Médecine, Nantes, France.
Aurélie GaultierGeneral Practice Department, Faculty of Médecine, Nantes, France.
Cédric RatGeneral Practice Department, Faculty of Médecine, Nantes, France.
Inserm · FRNantes Université · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Cervical cancer (CC) is the fourth most common cancer among women. It can be cured if diagnosed at an early stage and treated promptly. The World Health Organization suggests that 70% of women should be screened with a high-performance test by the age of 35. This paper reports a protocol to assess the effect of two modalities of organized CC screening programmes on CC screening uptake. Methods and analysis: Discussion: A large-scale randomized trial of this nature is unprecedented. The study will enable us to assess a strategy relying on GPs, identified as the coordinators in this screening strategy. The study results should help policy makers to implement organized CC screening programs in the future. Ethics and dissemination: The study was approved was approved by the Ethics Committee of the National College of Teaching General practitioners (IRB00010804). It was recorded in ClinicalTrials.gov on the number NCT04689178 (28 December 2020). The study findings will be used for publication in peer-reviewed scientific journals and presentations in scientific meetings.

Indexed as

General PractitionersUterine Cervical NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMass ScreeningPatient ComplianceRandomized Controlled Trials as Topiccervical cancer screening (CCS)general practitionersorganized screening programmesrandomized controlled clinical trial (RCT)screening uptake

Identifiers

PMID36438208
PMCPMC9686337
OpenAlexW4308877819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.