ArticleThe World Allergy Organization journal2022
Efficacy and safety of omalizumab against chronic spontaneous urticaria: Real-world study from China.
Article in The World Allergy Organization journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of the efficacy of different doses of omalizumab (150 mg vs 300 mg) in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis and low total IgE: A randomized, double-blind, controlled study.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2026Article
- Predictors of Super/Poor Omalizumab Response in Chinese Refractory Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria.Dermatology (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Analysis of Predictors of Response Degree to Omalizumab in 124 Patients with Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2026Article
- Factors Influencing Relapse After Omalizumab in Chronic Urticaria. Does the Method of Discontinuation Influence Relapse?Dermatology practical & conceptual · 2025Article
- Spectrum and Impact of Reported Side Effects of Omalizumab in Patients With Chronic Urticaria: A Long-Term Multicentre Real-World Study.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2025Article
- A retrospective analysis of factors influencing response to omalizumab treatment in Indian patients with antihistamine refractory chronic spontaneous urticaria.Asia Pacific allergy · 2025Article
- Utility of serum biomarkers in real-world practice for predicting response to omalizumab therapy in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global · 2025Article
- Antihistamines and omalizumab combination treatment in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria: Real-world experience from a tertiary care hospital.Northern clinics of Istanbul · 2025Article
- Safety and efficacy of omalizumab for antihistamine-resistant chronic urticaria in children: a case series and literature review.World journal of pediatrics : WJP · 2024Review
- Omalizumab's efficacy and safety against chronic spontaneous urticaria.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Omalizumab is an effective treatment for chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) patients aged ≥12 years, but its efficacy in patients aged <12 years has not been fully documented. We evaluated the therapeutic efficacy and safety of omalizumab in Chinese CSU population across all age groups. Objectives: To assess the efficacy and safety of omalizumab treatment against CSU in China. Methods: This study was a retrospective and observational study, and the clinical data of CSU patients treated with omalizumab from October 2018 to August 2021 were collected and analyzed. Results: We enrolled 235 patients in this study, and 54.0% (n = 127/235) of patients were female. All patients received at least three injections of omalizumab treatment, and the mean treatment duration was 3.4 ± 1.0 months. At the end of week-12, 98.7% (n = 232/235) of patients responded to omalizumab, among which 91.1% (n = 214/235) achieved a complete response (CR). An excellent response to omalizumab treatment was observed across all ages. All patients aged <12 years (n = 26) achieved a CR at the end of week-12, and clinical improvement was maintained until treatment cessation. Eighty-seven patients received 3-9-month follow-up after the end of treatment, with a mean duration of 5.7 ± 2.0 months, and 17.2% (n = 15/87) patients experienced recurrence after discontinuing treatment. No factors associated with therapeutic response and recurrence to omalizumab treatment were found in this study. Conclusion: Omalizumab is a safe and efficacious therapy for CSU patients, including those aged <12 years. We recommend addition of omalizumab to the treatment regimen in CSU patients under 12 years of age. Trial registration number: This study was registered in Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (www.chictr.org.cn, Registration number: ChiCTR2200056599).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.