ArticleFrontiers in plant science2022
Plant disease symptom segmentation in chlorophyll fluorescence imaging with a synthetic dataset.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Spotlight on challenges and novel methods in highly multiplexed tissue imaging-based spatial proteomics.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Exploring Imaging Techniques for Detecting Tomato Spotted Wilt Virus (TSWV) Infection in Pepper (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Review
- Classification of tomato seedling chilling injury based on chlorophyll fluorescence imaging and DBO-BiLSTM.Frontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Non-destructive monitoring method for leaf area ofFrontiers in plant science · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite the wide use of computer vision methods in plant health monitoring, little attention is paid to segmenting the diseased leaf area at its early stages. It can be explained by the lack of datasets of plant images with annotated disease lesions. We propose a novel methodology to generate fluorescent images of diseased plants with an automated lesion annotation. We demonstrate that a U-Net model aiming to segment disease lesions on fluorescent images of plant leaves can be efficiently trained purely by a synthetically generated dataset. The trained model showed 0.793% recall and 0.723% average precision against an empirical fluorescent test dataset. Creating and using such synthetic data can be a powerful technique to facilitate the application of deep learning methods in precision crop protection. Moreover, our method of generating synthetic fluorescent images is a way to improve the generalization ability of deep learning models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.