Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36438100›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2022

Effect of different waterlogging periods on biochemistry, growth, and chlorophyll

Shubhangani Sharma, Upma Bhatt, Jyotshana Sharma, Ahmad Darkalt, Jacek Mojski, Vineet Soni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shubhangani SharmaPlant Bioenergetics and Biotechnology Laboratory, Mohanlal Sukhadia University, Udaipur, India.
Upma BhattPlant Bioenergetics and Biotechnology Laboratory, Mohanlal Sukhadia University, Udaipur, India.
Jyotshana SharmaPlant Bioenergetics and Biotechnology Laboratory, Mohanlal Sukhadia University, Udaipur, India.
Ahmad DarkaltDepartment of Renewable Natural Resources & Ecology, Engineering Agricultural Faculty, Aleppo University, Aleppo, Syria.
Jacek MojskiTwój Swiat Jacek Mojski, Lukow, Poland.
Vineet SoniPlant Bioenergetics and Biotechnology Laboratory, Mohanlal Sukhadia University, Udaipur, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peanut is among the main oil crops in India with huge economic importance. The unpredictable rainy season during the growing time of peanuts causes waterlogging in peanut fields. Waterlogging triggers major environmental limitations that negatively affect the growth, physiology, and development of peanuts. Thus, the export and production of peanuts are severely affected by waterlogging. Therefore, the understanding of metabolic mechanisms under waterlogging is important to future water-stress tolerance breeding in peanuts. This study aimed to evaluate how peanuts responded to various waterlogging conditions in terms of their development, metabolic processes, and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics. The evaluations were carried out at different stages of peanut variety DH-86 treated with waterlogging. The peanut plants were subjected to different waterlogging periods of 20, 40, 60, 80, and 100 days. The growth parameters including total dry mass, total leaf area, and total leaves number were calculated in all treatments. The phenomenological and specific energy fluxes and maximum photosystem II efficiency (F

Indexed as

chlorophyll a fluorescenceleaf areamaximum photosystem II efficiencyoilseedspeanutwaterlogging

Identifiers

PMID36438100
PMCPMC9686000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.