Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36438046›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2022

Amniotic membrane transplantation and conjunctival autograft combined with mitomycin C for the management of primary pterygium: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Nada Omar Taher, Ahmed Naji Alnabihi, Reem Mahmoud Hersi, Rawan Khalid Alrajhi, Reham Ahmad Alzahrani, Waleed Talib Batais, Alaa Hesham Mofti, Saeed Abdullah Alghamdi

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Rational Drug Use in Extraocular SurgeriesTurkish journal of ophthalmology · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Use of Mitomycin C in Ophthalmic Surgery.Journal of current ophthalmology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nada Omar TaherCollege of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Ahmed Naji AlnabihiCollege of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Reem Mahmoud HersiCollege of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Rawan Khalid AlrajhiCollege of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Reham Ahmad AlzahraniCollege of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Waleed Talib BataisCollege of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Alaa Hesham MoftiCollege of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Saeed Abdullah AlghamdiCollege of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
King Abdullah International Medical Research Center · SAKing Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences · SANational Guard Health Affairs · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Pterygium is a common ocular surface disease. Recurrence is the greatest concern in the treatment of pterygium. Thus, a standardized and effective treatment modality with minimal risk for complications is needed for the management of pterygium. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate different tissue grafting options, including conjunctival autograft (CAG) with mitomycin C (MMC), CAG alone, and amniotic membrane transplantation (AMT), for the management of primary pterygium. Methods: We searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases for relevant studies. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in which CAG + MMC and AMT were compared with surgical excision with CAG alone for the treatment of primary pterygium. The rates of recurrence and adverse events reported in the studies were also evaluated. Risk ratio (RR) was used to represent dichotomous outcomes. The data were pooled using the inverse variance weighting method. The quality of the evidence derived from the analysis was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Risk of bias was assessed using the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials. Results: Twelve RCTs ( Conclusion: A single intraoperative topical application of 0.02% MMC during excision of pterygium followed by CAG has significantly shown to decrease the rate of pterygium recurrence to 1.4% with no severe complications.

Indexed as

amniotic membrane transplantautologous conjunctival transplantationconjunctival autograftmitomycin Cpterygium

Identifiers

PMID36438046
PMCPMC9684179
OpenAlexW4308867368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.