ArticleIndian journal of anaesthesia2022
Role of video-based learning on competency level of direct laryngoscopic skills of novice anaesthesiologists - A randomised clinical trial.
Article in Indian journal of anaesthesia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for teaching direct laryngoscopy skills: a systematic review and meta-analysis.British journal of anaesthesia · 2025Pooled it
- Risk of bias in published randomised controlled trials.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2023Article
- Trends in research inIndian journal of anaesthesia · 2023Article
- Thrust on airway research - Exploring the publications.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Video laryngoscopes are often used for education and training of intubation skills. This study aimed to examine the influence of video-assisted guidance and video replay on intubation skills of novice anaesthesiologists. Methods: Adult patients of American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status grade I-II, with a normal airway and scheduled to undergo elective surgical procedures requiring general anaesthesia and orotracheal intubation were included in this randomised study. Ten trainee anaesthesiologists, with no prior experience of performing tracheal intubation were enroled and randomly divided into group STD (received traditional learning) and group VL (received video-based learning). After initial mannequin training, the first seven intubations in patients in both the groups were done under supervision. In group VL, in addition to traditional cues, posttracheal intubation, the trainee and instructor had a session of video replay to discuss the entire process of laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation with areas of improvement. For the subsequent 15 intubations in patients, the trainees intubated independently using a standard Macintosh blade. The primary objective was to compare time required to intubate (TTI) for both groups using Mann-Whitney U test. Secondary objectives included comparison of difficulty in intubation (using a 5-point Likert scale), self-confidence scores (1-10, 10 - most confident), and intubation-related trauma. Results: The mean TTI was significantly lower in group VL than in group STD - 40s [Interquartile range (IQR): 32-50] versus 52s [IQR: 39-76], P = 0.002. No difference was seen in self-assessed confidence levels, rating of difficulty in intubation, and airway trauma. Conclusion: Video replay of the intubation process has a positive impact on direct laryngoscopy learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.