Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36437955›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2022

Examining the effects of

Laura Lorenzo-Rebenaque, Cristina Casto-Rebollo, Gianfranco Diretto, Sarah Frusciante, Juan Carlos Rodríguez, María-Paz Ventero, Carmen Molina-Pardines, Santiago Vega, Clara Marin, Francisco Marco-Jiménez

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A Mini-Review on Multi-Hurdle Control ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Modulation of Caecal Microbiota and Metabolome Profile inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Laura Lorenzo-RebenaqueDepartment of Animal Production and Health, Veterinary Public Health and Food Science and Technology, Biomedical Research Institute, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Cardenal Herrera-CEU University, CEU Universities, Valencia, Spain.
Cristina Casto-RebolloInstitute of Science and Animal Technology, Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain.
Gianfranco DirettoItalian Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Development (ENEA), Biotechnology Laboratory, Centro Ricerche Casaccia, Santa Maria di Galeria, Rome, Italy.
Sarah FruscianteItalian Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Development (ENEA), Biotechnology Laboratory, Centro Ricerche Casaccia, Santa Maria di Galeria, Rome, Italy.
Juan Carlos RodríguezMicrobiology Department, Balmis General University Hospital, Microbiology Division, Miguel Hernández University, ISABIAL, Alicante, Spain.
María-Paz VenteroMicrobiology Department, Balmis General University Hospital, ISABIAL, Alicante, Spain.
Carmen Molina-PardinesMicrobiology Department, Balmis General University Hospital, ISABIAL, Alicante, Spain.
Santiago VegaDepartment of Animal Production and Health, Veterinary Public Health and Food Science and Technology, Biomedical Research Institute, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Cardenal Herrera-CEU University, CEU Universities, Valencia, Spain.
Clara MarinDepartment of Animal Production and Health, Veterinary Public Health and Food Science and Technology, Biomedical Research Institute, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Cardenal Herrera-CEU University, CEU Universities, Valencia, Spain.
Francisco Marco-JiménezInstitute of Science and Animal Technology, Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain.
Universidad Cardenal Herrera CEU · ESHospital General Universitario de Alicante Doctor Balmis · ESNational Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development · ITUniversitat Politècnica de València · ESUniversitat de Miguel Hernández d'Elx · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacteriophages selectively infect and kill their target bacterial host, being a promising approach to controlling zoonotic bacteria in poultry production. To ensure confidence in its use, fundamental questions of safety and toxicity monitoring of phage therapy should be raised. Due to its high specificity, a minimal impact on the gut ecology is expected; however, more in-depth research into key parameters that influence the success of phage interventions has been needed to reach a consensus on the impact of bacteriophage therapy in the gut. In this context, this study aimed to investigate the interaction of phages with animals; more specifically, we compared the caecum microbiome and metabolome after a

Indexed as

bacteriophageshigh throughput sequencingmicrobiomeomic sciencespoultry

Identifiers

PMID36437955
PMCPMC9691336
OpenAlexW4308875870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.