Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36437927›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2022

Comparisons of constitutive resistances to soybean cyst nematode between PI 88788- and Peking-type sources of resistance in soybean by transcriptomic and metabolomic profilings.

Shanshan Chu, Hui Ma, Ke Li, Junfeng Li, Hongli Liu, Leipo Quan, Xuling Zhu, Meiling Chen, Wenyan Lu, Xiaoming Chen and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shanshan ChuCollaborative Innovation Center of Henan Grain Crops /College of Agronomy, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, China.
Hui MaCollaborative Innovation Center of Henan Grain Crops /College of Agronomy, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, China.
Ke LiCollaborative Innovation Center of Henan Grain Crops /College of Agronomy, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, China.
Junfeng LiCollaborative Innovation Center of Henan Grain Crops /College of Agronomy, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, China.
Hongli LiuCollaborative Innovation Center of Henan Grain Crops /College of Agronomy, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, China.
Leipo QuanCollaborative Innovation Center of Henan Grain Crops /College of Agronomy, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, China.
Xuling ZhuCollaborative Innovation Center of Henan Grain Crops /College of Agronomy, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, China.
Meiling ChenCollaborative Innovation Center of Henan Grain Crops /College of Agronomy, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, China.
Wenyan LuCollaborative Innovation Center of Henan Grain Crops /College of Agronomy, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, China.
Xiaoming ChenCollaborative Innovation Center of Henan Grain Crops /College of Agronomy, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, China.
Xuelian QuCollaborative Innovation Center of Henan Grain Crops /College of Agronomy, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, China.
Jiaqi XuCollaborative Innovation Center of Henan Grain Crops /College of Agronomy, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, China.
Yun LianZhengzhou Subcenter of National Soybean Improvement Center, Key Laboratory of Oil Crops in Huang-Huai Valleys of Ministry of Agriculture, Institute of Industrial Crops, Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Zhengzhou, China.
Weiguo LuZhengzhou Subcenter of National Soybean Improvement Center, Key Laboratory of Oil Crops in Huang-Huai Valleys of Ministry of Agriculture, Institute of Industrial Crops, Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Zhengzhou, China.
Erhui XiongCollaborative Innovation Center of Henan Grain Crops /College of Agronomy, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, China.
Yongqing JiaoCollaborative Innovation Center of Henan Grain Crops /College of Agronomy, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, China.
Henan Agricultural University · CNHenan Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Soybean cyst nematode (SCN) is a serious damaging disease in soybean worldwide. Peking- and PI 88788-type sources of resistance are two most important germplasm used in breeding resistant soybean cultivars against this disease. However, until now, no comparisons of constitutive resistances to soybean cyst nematode between these two types of sources had been conducted, probably due to the influences of different backgrounds. In this study, we used pooled-sample analysis strategy to minimize the influence of different backgrounds and directly compared the molecular mechanisms underlying constitutive resistance to soybean cyst nematode between these two types of sources

Indexed as

metabolomePekingPI 88788soybeansoybean cyst nematodetranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID36437927
PMCPMC9686325
OpenAlexW4308869608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.