Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36437889›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and ecotechnology2023

Techno-economic analysis of sidestream ammonia removal technologies: Biological options versus thermal stripping.

Pascal Ochs, Ben Martin, Eve Germain-Cripps, Tom Stephenson, Mark van Loosdrecht, Ana Soares

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and ecotechnology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. A review on low-temperature denitrification technologies: evolution, mechanisms and prospects for sustainable wastewater treatment.Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Pascal OchsCranfield University, College Road, Cranfield, Bedford, MK43 0AL, United Kingdom.
Ben MartinThames Water, Reading STW, Island Road, RG2 0RP, Reading, United Kingdom.
Eve Germain-CrippsThames Water, Reading STW, Island Road, RG2 0RP, Reading, United Kingdom.
Tom StephensonCranfield University, College Road, Cranfield, Bedford, MK43 0AL, United Kingdom.
Mark van LoosdrechtDelft University of Technology, Building 58, Van der Maasweg 9, 2629, Delft, Netherlands.
Ana SoaresCranfield University, College Road, Cranfield, Bedford, MK43 0AL, United Kingdom.
Thames Water (United Kingdom) · GBCranfield University · GBDelft University of Technology · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past twenty years, various commercial technologies have been deployed to remove ammonia (NH

Indexed as

DeammonificationDenitrificationNitrificationSludge dewatering liquorsWastewater

Identifiers

PMID36437889
PMCPMC9691913
OpenAlexW4308387644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.