Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36437858›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in research metrics and analytics2022

ORCID coverage in research institutions-Readiness for partially automated research reporting.

Kathrin Schnieders, Sandra Mierz, Sabine Boccalini, Wibke Meyer Zu Westerhausen, Christian Hauschke, Stephanie Hagemann-Wilholt, Sonja Schulze

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in research metrics and analytics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kathrin SchniedersCentralized Reporting, Osnabrueck University, Osnabrueck, Germany.
Sandra MierzOpen Science Lab, Leibniz Information Centre for Science and Technology - TIB, Hannover, Germany.
Sabine BoccaliniUniversity Library, Osnabrueck University, Osnabrueck, Germany.
Wibke Meyer Zu WesterhausenUniversity Library, Osnabrueck University, Osnabrueck, Germany.
Christian HauschkeOpen Science Lab, Leibniz Information Centre for Science and Technology - TIB, Hannover, Germany.
Stephanie Hagemann-WilholtPID Competence Centre, Leibniz Information Centre for Science and Technology - TIB, Hannover, Germany.
Sonja SchulzeCentralized Reporting, Osnabrueck University, Osnabrueck, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reporting and presentation of research activities and outcome for research institutions in official, normative standards are more and more important and are the basis to comply with reporting duties. Institutional Current Research Information Systems (CRIS) serve as important databases or data sources for external and internal reporting, which should ideally be connected with interfaces to the operational systems for automated loading routines to extract relevant research information. This investigation evaluates whether (semi-) automated reporting using open, public research information collected

Indexed as

current research information system (CRIS)FREYAlinked open metadataOpenAlexORCIDpersistent identifier (PID)ROR(semi-)automated research reporting

Identifiers

PMID36437858
PMCPMC9684708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.