Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36437505›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of nutrition2023

Determining the protocol requirements of in-home dog food digestibility testing.

Evelien Bos, Wouter Hendriks, Bonne Beerda, Guido Bosch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of nutrition, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Protein hydrolysates fromTranslational animal science · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Evaluation of the nutrient digestibility at each age in dogs diet byJournal of animal science and technology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Evelien BosAnimal Nutrition Group, Wageningen University & Research, De Elst 1, 6708 WD, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9196-2392
Wouter HendriksAnimal Nutrition Group, Wageningen University & Research, De Elst 1, 6708 WD, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Bonne BeerdaBehavioural Ecology Group, Wageningen University & Research, De Elst 1, 6708 WD, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Guido BoschAnimal Nutrition Group, Wageningen University & Research, De Elst 1, 6708 WD, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5714-9506

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In-home pet food testing has the benefit of yielding data which is directly applicable to the pet population. Validated and standardised in-home test protocols need to be available, and here we investigated key protocol requirements for an in-home canine food digestibility protocol. Participants were recruited via an online survey. After meeting specific inclusion criteria, sixty dogs of various breeds and ages received, during 14 consecutive days, a relatively low and high digestible complete dry extruded food containing titanium (Ti) dioxide. Both foods were given for 7 d in a cross-over design. Owners collected faeces daily allowing daily faecal Ti concentrations and digestibility of nitrogen (N), dry matter (DM), crude ash, organic matter (OM), crude fat (Cfat), starch and gross energy (GE) to be determined. Faecal Ti and digestibility values for all nutrients were not different (

Indexed as

Animal FeedDigestionAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsDietDogsFecesNutrientsStarchNutrientsStarchAdaptationFaecal collectionIn-home testProtocol requirementsSample size

Identifiers

PMID36437505
PMCPMC10244015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.