ArticleHead & neck2023
An objective analysis of composite free flap donor site morbidity in head and neck surgery: Prospective series.
Article in Head & neck, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Functional outcomes and quality of life following free fibula flap harvest: a comparative analysis of flexor hallucis longus resection versus preservation.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Donor Limb Functional Restoration via a Novel Clinical Care Pathway following Fibula Free Flap Harvest for Head and Neck Reconstruction.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2024Article
- Innovative Strategies in Microvascular Head and Neck Reconstruction.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Review
- An objective analysis of composite free flap donor site morbidity in head and neck surgery: Prospective series.Head & neck · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA poor evidence basis exists regarding the objective donor site morbidity associated with osseous free flap harvest. This study prospectively assessed the objective donor site morbidity associated with osseous free flap harvest for the fibula, scapula, and iliac crest (DCIA) donor sites.
methodsA single-site, prospective cohort clinical research study was conducted. Sixty-four patients were recruited between 2017 and 2021. Patients were assessed using a donor site specific assessment tool pre-operatively, and again >12 months post-operatively.
resultsThere was a significant reduction post-operatively in assessment tool scores compared to the pre-operative period for the fibula, scapula and DCIA. Females were more likely to report a greater reduction in Harris Hip Score post-operatively compared to males.
conclusionsThe fibula, scapula, and DCIA donor sites are associated with reduced objective function post-operatively compared to patient's pre-operative baseline. The implications are least pronounced for the fibula.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.