Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36437469›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2022

Comparison of machine learning methods with logistic regression analysis in creating predictive models for risk of critical in-hospital events in COVID-19 patients on hospital admission.

Aaron W Sievering, Peter Wohlmuth, Nele Geßler, Melanie A Gunawardene, Klaus Herrlinger, Berthold Bein, Dirk Arnold, Martin Bergmann, Lorenz Nowak, Christian Gloeckner and 4 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04659187 ("CORONA Germany" - Clinical Outcome and Risk in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients - An Epidemiological Study From Germany), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04659187 unknown statusnot on this map

"CORONA Germany" - Clinical Outcome and Risk in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients - An Epidemiological Study From Germany

TypeobservationalSponsorAsklepios proresearchRan2020 to 2021Enrolled4,000ConditionsCOVID-19
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Aaron W SieveringSemmelweis University, Asklepios Campus Hamburg, Budapest, Hungary.
Peter WohlmuthSemmelweis University, Asklepios Campus Hamburg, Budapest, Hungary.
Nele GeßlerSemmelweis University, Asklepios Campus Hamburg, Budapest, Hungary.
Melanie A GunawardeneDepartment of Cardiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Asklepios Hospital St. Georg, Hamburg, Germany.
Klaus HerrlingerDepartment of Internal Medicine, Asklepios Hospital Nord-Heidberg, Hamburg, Germany.
Berthold BeinDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Asklepios Hospital St. Georg, Hamburg, Germany.
Dirk ArnoldAsklepios Tumorzentrum, Hamburg, Germany.
Martin BergmannDepartment of Internal Medicine, Cardiology, and Pneumology, Asklepios Hospital Wandsbek, Hamburg, Germany.
Lorenz NowakDepartment of Intensive Care and Ventilation Medicine, Asklepios Hospital München-Gauting, Gauting, Germany.
Christian GloecknerDepartment of Internal Medicine, Asklepios Hospital Oberviechtach, Oberviechtach, Germany.
Ina KochBiobank for Pulmonary Diseases, Asklepios Hospital München-Gauting, Gauting, Germany.
Martin BachmannDepartment of Intensive Care and Ventilatory Medicine, Asklepios Hospital Harburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Christoph U HerbornSemmelweis University, Asklepios Campus Hamburg, Budapest, Hungary.
Axel StangSemmelweis University, Asklepios Campus Hamburg, Budapest, Hungary. a.stang@asklepios.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMachine learning (ML) algorithms have been trained to early predict critical in-hospital events from COVID-19 using patient data at admission, but little is known on how their performance compares with each other and/or with statistical logistic regression (LR). This prospective multicentre cohort study compares the performance of a LR and five ML models on the contribution of influencing predictors and predictor-to-event relationships on prediction model´s performance.

methodsWe used 25 baseline variables of 490 COVID-19 patients admitted to 8 hospitals in Germany (March-November 2020) to develop and validate (75/25 random-split) 3 linear (L1 and L2 penalty, elastic net [EN]) and 2 non-linear (support vector machine [SVM] with radial kernel, random forest [RF]) ML approaches for predicting critical events defined by intensive care unit transfer, invasive ventilation and/or death (composite end-point: 181 patients). Models were compared for performance (area-under-the-receiver-operating characteristic-curve [AUC], Brier score) and predictor importance (performance-loss metrics, partial-dependence profiles).

resultsModels performed close with a small benefit for LR (utilizing restricted cubic splines for non-linearity) and RF (AUC means: 0.763-0.731 [RF-L1]); Brier scores: 0.184-0.197 [LR-L1]). Top ranked predictor variables (consistently highest importance: C-reactive protein) were largely identical across models, except creatinine, which exhibited marginal (L1, L2, EN, SVM) or high/non-linear effects (LR, RF) on events.

conclusionsAlthough the LR and ML models analysed showed no strong differences in performance and the most influencing predictors for COVID-19-related event prediction, our results indicate a predictive benefit from taking account for non-linear predictor-to-event relationships and effects. Future efforts should focus on leveraging data-driven ML technologies from static towards dynamic modelling solutions that continuously learn and adapt to changes in data environments during the evolving pandemic. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04659187.

Indexed as

COVID-19Cohort StudiesHospitalsHumansLogistic ModelsMachine LearningProspective StudiesClinical decision-makingCOVID-19Critical event predictionMachine learningPredictive models

Identifiers

PMID36437469
PMCPMC9702742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.