ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2022
Comparison of machine learning methods with logistic regression analysis in creating predictive models for risk of critical in-hospital events in COVID-19 patients on hospital admission.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04659187 ("CORONA Germany" - Clinical Outcome and Risk in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients - An Epidemiological Study From Germany), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
"CORONA Germany" - Clinical Outcome and Risk in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients - An Epidemiological Study From Germany
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Artificial intelligence in intensive care units: a scoping review addressing the translational gap to clinical practice.Korean journal of anesthesiology · 2026Article
- Machine learning-enhanced modeling approach for optimally predicting household level food insecurity in Ethiopia during COVID-19.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Statistical methods for predicting the presence of Salmonella Typhi in wastewater samples at Asante Akyem Agogo, Ghana.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2026Article
- Clinical predictive fusion network for accurate disease prediction in patient cohorts.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- PrevCardioOncAI: Machine Learning Algorithms for Predicting Cardiovascular Disease in Cancer Survivors.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Observational
- Construction and validation of a multi-dimensional health indicator-driven osteoporosis risk prediction model: a large-sample cross-sectional study based on two centers.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
- An investigation into the impact of temporality on COVID-19 infection and mortality predictions: new perspective based on Shapley Values.BMC medical research methodology · 2025Article
- Predicting total healthcare demand using machine learning: separate and combined analysis of predisposing, enabling, and need factors.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Comparative analysis of frequentist, Bayesian, and machine learning models for predicting SARS-CoV-2 PCR positivity.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
- Does machine learning improve prediction accuracy of the Endoscopic Third Ventriculostomy Success Score? A contemporary Hydrocephalus Clinical Research Network cohort study.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2024Article
- Life-Course Multidisciplinary Psychosocial Predictors of Dementia Among Older Adults: Results From the Health and Retirement Study.Innovation in aging · 2024Article
- Artificial Intelligence Models in Health Information Exchange: A Systematic Review of Clinical Implications.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Observational
- Supervised Machine Learning Models to Identify Early-Stage Symptoms of SARS-CoV-2.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Mapping the landscape of machine learning in chronic disease management: A comprehensive bibliometric study.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMachine learning (ML) algorithms have been trained to early predict critical in-hospital events from COVID-19 using patient data at admission, but little is known on how their performance compares with each other and/or with statistical logistic regression (LR). This prospective multicentre cohort study compares the performance of a LR and five ML models on the contribution of influencing predictors and predictor-to-event relationships on prediction model´s performance.
methodsWe used 25 baseline variables of 490 COVID-19 patients admitted to 8 hospitals in Germany (March-November 2020) to develop and validate (75/25 random-split) 3 linear (L1 and L2 penalty, elastic net [EN]) and 2 non-linear (support vector machine [SVM] with radial kernel, random forest [RF]) ML approaches for predicting critical events defined by intensive care unit transfer, invasive ventilation and/or death (composite end-point: 181 patients). Models were compared for performance (area-under-the-receiver-operating characteristic-curve [AUC], Brier score) and predictor importance (performance-loss metrics, partial-dependence profiles).
resultsModels performed close with a small benefit for LR (utilizing restricted cubic splines for non-linearity) and RF (AUC means: 0.763-0.731 [RF-L1]); Brier scores: 0.184-0.197 [LR-L1]). Top ranked predictor variables (consistently highest importance: C-reactive protein) were largely identical across models, except creatinine, which exhibited marginal (L1, L2, EN, SVM) or high/non-linear effects (LR, RF) on events.
conclusionsAlthough the LR and ML models analysed showed no strong differences in performance and the most influencing predictors for COVID-19-related event prediction, our results indicate a predictive benefit from taking account for non-linear predictor-to-event relationships and effects. Future efforts should focus on leveraging data-driven ML technologies from static towards dynamic modelling solutions that continuously learn and adapt to changes in data environments during the evolving pandemic. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04659187.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.