Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36437457›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal for equity in health2022

Health effects of Indigenous language use and revitalization: a realist review.

D H Whalen, Melissa E Lewis, Stefanie Gillson, Brittany McBeath, Bri Alexander, Kate Nyhan

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal for equity in health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Measuring Indigenous Cultural Strengths: a Systematic Review of a Decade of Approaches.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Understanding one First Nations community's ways of healing from historical trauma.Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy · 2026
    Article
  3. A profile of heart failure in the James and Hudson's Bay region of Ontario: A retrospective cohort study.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Māori Health, Wellbeing, and Disability in Aotearoa New Zealand: A National Survey.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

D H WhalenEndangered Language Fund, 300 George St., Suite 900, New Haven, CT, 06511, USA. douglas.whalen@yale.edu.
Melissa E LewisDepartment of Family & Community Medicine, University of Missouri School of Medicine, MA301 Medical Sciences Bldg, Columbia, MO, 65212, USA.
Stefanie GillsonYale Child Study Center, 230 South Frontage Road, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA.
Brittany McBeathSchool of Kinesiology and Health Studies, Queen's University, 28 Division Street, Kingston, ON, K7L 3N6, Canada.
Bri AlexanderProgram in Anthropology, CUNY Graduate Center, 365 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY, 10016, USA.
Kate NyhanCushing/Whitney Medical Library, 333 Cedar St, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIndigenous populations across the world are more likely to suffer from poor health outcomes when compared to other racial and ethnic groups. Although these disparities have many sources, one protective factor that has become increasingly apparent is the continued use and/or revitalization of traditional Indigenous lifeways: Indigenous language in particular. This realist review is aimed at bringing together the literature that addresses effects of language use and revitalization on mental and physical health.

methodsPurposive bibliographic searches on Scopus were conducted to identify relevant publications, further augmented by forward citation chaining. Included publications (qualitative and quantitative) described health outcomes for groups of Indigenous people who either did or did not learn and/or use their ancestral language. The geographical area studied was restricted to the Americas, Australia or New Zealand. Publications that were not written in English, Spanish, French, Portuguese or German were excluded. A realist approach was followed to identify positive, neutral or negative effects of language use and/or acquisition on health, with both qualitative and quantitative measures considered.

resultsThe bibliographic search yielded a total of 3508 possible publications of which 130 publications were included in the realist analysis. The largest proportion of the outcomes addressed in the studies (62.1%) reported positive effects. Neutral outcomes accounted for 16.6% of the reported effects. Negative effects (21.4%) were often qualified by such issues as possible cultural use of tobacco, testing educational outcomes in a student's second language, and correlation with socioeconomic status (SES), health access, or social determinants of health; it is of note that the positive correlations with language use just as frequently occurred with these issues as the negative correlations did.

conclusionsLanguage use and revitalization emerge as protective factors in the health of Indigenous populations. Benefits of language programs in tribal and other settings should be considered a cost-effective way of improving outcomes in multiple domains.

Indexed as

Health StatusLanguageAustraliaHumansNew ZealandUnited StatesHealthIndigenousLanguage revitalizationLanguage useRealist review

Identifiers

PMID36437457
PMCPMC9703682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.