Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36437450›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2022

Providing evidence-based knowledge on nursing interventions at the point of care: findings from a mapping project.

Renate Ranegger, Simon Haug, Janine Vetsch, Dieter Baumberger, Reto Bürgin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Renate RaneggerDepartment of Research and Development, LEP AG, 9000, St. Gallen, Switzerland. renate.ranegger@lep.ch.
Simon HaugDepartment of Health, Institute of Applied Nursing Science, Eastern Switzerland University of Applied Sciences, 9000, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Janine VetschDepartment of Health, Institute of Applied Nursing Science, Eastern Switzerland University of Applied Sciences, 9000, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Dieter BaumbergerDepartment of Research and Development, LEP AG, 9000, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Reto BürginDepartment of Research and Development, LEP AG, 9000, St. Gallen, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn healthcare there is a call to provide cost-efficient and safe care. This can be achieved through evidence-based practice (EBP), defined as the use of evidence from research, context, patient preferences, and clinical expertise. However, the contemporary and process-integrated supply of evidence-based knowledge at the point of care is a major challenge. An integrative knowledge management system supporting practicing clinical nurses in their daily work providing evidence-based knowledge at the point of care is required. The aim of this study was (1) to map standardized and structured nursing interventions classification and evidence on a knowledge platform to support evidence-based knowledge at the point of care, and (2) to explore the challenge of achieving interoperability between the source terminology of the nursing interventions classification (LEP Nursing 3) and the target format of the evidence provided on the knowledge platform (FIT-Nursing Care).

methodsIn an iterative three-round mapping process, three raters, nurses with clinical and nursing informatics or EBP experience, matched nursing interventions from the LEP Nursing 3 classification and evidence provided from Cochrane Reviews summarized on FIT-Nursing Care as so-called study synopses. We used a logical mapping method. We analysed the feasibility using thematic analysis.

resultsIn the third and final mapping round, a total of 47.01% (252 of 536) of nursing interventions from LEP Nursing 3 were mapped to 92.31% (300 of 325) of synopses from FIT-Nursing Care. The interrater reliability of 77.52% suggests good agreement. The experience from the whole mapping process provides important findings: (1) different content orientations-because both systems pursue different purposes (content validity), (2) content granularity-differences regarding the structure and the level of detail in both systems, and (3) operationalization of knowledge.

conclusionMapping of research evidence to nursing classification seems feasible; however, three specific challenges were identified: different content orientation; content granularity; and operationalization of knowledge. The next step for this integrative knowledge management system will now be testing at the point of care.

Indexed as

Nursing InformaticsPoint-of-Care SystemsHumansKnowledge BasesReproducibility of ResultsVocabulary, ControlledEvidence-based knowledgeIntegrative knowledge management systemNursing interventionsPoint of care

Identifiers

PMID36437450
PMCPMC9703782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.