Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36437405›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Adaptive simulation of 3D thermometry maps for interventional MR-guided tumor ablation using Pennes' bioheat equation and isotherms.

Julian Alpers, Maximilian Rötzer, Marcel Gutberlet, Frank Wacker, Bennet Hensen, Christian Hansen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Computational Design of a Thermal Applicator for Brain Hyperthermia Controlled by Capacitor Positioning in Loop Coils.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Julian AlpersOtto-von-Guericke University, Faculty of Computer Science, Magdeburg, 39106, Germany. julian.alpers@ovgu.de.
Maximilian RötzerOtto-von-Guericke University, Faculty of Computer Science, Magdeburg, 39106, Germany.
Marcel GutberletHannover Medical School, Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover, 30625, Germany.
Frank WackerHannover Medical School, Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover, 30625, Germany.
Bennet HensenHannover Medical School, Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover, 30625, Germany.
Christian HansenOtto-von-Guericke University, Faculty of Computer Science, Magdeburg, 39106, Germany.

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 13GW0473ADeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft ME 3696/3-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Minimally-invasive thermal ablation procedures have become clinically accepted treatment options for tumors and metastases. Continuous and reliable monitoring of volumetric heat distribution promises to be an important condition for successful outcomes. In this work, an adaptive bioheat transfer simulation of 3D thermometry maps is presented. Pennes' equation model is updated according to temperature maps generated by uniformly distributed 2D MR phase images rotated around the main axis of the applicator. The volumetric heat diffusion and the resulting shape of the ablation zone can be modelled accurately without introducing a specific heat source term. Filtering the temperature maps by extracting isotherms reduces artefacts and noise, compresses information of the measured data and adds physical a priori knowledge. The inverse heat transfer for estimating values of the simulated tissue and heating parameters is done by reducing the sum squared error between these isotherms and the 3D simulation. The approach is evaluated on data sets consisting of 13 ex vivo bio protein phantoms, including six perfusion phantoms with simulated heat sink effects. Results show an overall average Dice score of 0.89 ± 0.04 (SEM < 0.01). The optimization of the parameters takes 1.05 ± 0.26 s for each acquired image. Future steps should consider the local optimization of the simulation parameters instead of a global one to better detect heat sinks without a priori knowledge. In addition, the use of a proper Kalman filter might increase robustness and accuracy if combined with our method.

Indexed as

ThermometryComputer SimulationHot TemperaturePhantoms, ImagingTemperature

Identifiers

PMID36437405
PMCPMC9701800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.