Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36437404›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Exploration of the optimal modularity in assembly line design.

Vladimir Modrak, Zuzana Soltysova

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Vladimir ModrakFaculty of Manufacturing Technologies, Technical University of Kosice, 080 01, Pres̆ov, Slovakia. vladimir.modrak@tuke.sk.
Zuzana SoltysovaFaculty of Manufacturing Technologies, Technical University of Kosice, 080 01, Pres̆ov, Slovakia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is widely accepted that a proper structural modularity degree of assembly processes in terms of mass customization has a positive effect on their efficiency because it, among other things, increases manufacturing flexibility and productivity. On the other hand, most practical approaches to identify such a degree is rather based on intuition or analytical reasoning than on scientific foundations. However, the first way can be used for simple assembly tasks, but in more complex assembly processes, this method lags behind the second. The purpose was to create a methodology for selection of optimal modular assembly model from among a predefined set of alternatives. The methodology is based on exploration of the relations between modularity measures and complexity issues as well as the relationship between structural modularity and symmetry. Especially, the linkage between modularity and complexity properties has been explored in order to show how modularization can affect distribution of the total structural complexity across the entire assembly line. To solve this selection problem, three different methods are preliminary suggested and compared via a series of numerical tests. The two of them present the novel contribution of this work, while the third method developed earlier for the purpose of finding and evaluating community structure in networks was adapted for a given application domain. Based on obtained results, one of these method is prioritized over another, since it offers more promising results and precision too.

Indexed as

Manufactured Materials

Identifiers

PMID36437404
PMCPMC9701789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.