ArticleScientific reports2022
A novel prognostic model for cutaneous melanoma based on an immune-related gene signature and clinical variables.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Constructing a novel MPT-driven necrosis-associated gene set for predicting prognosis and immune status in skin cutaneous melanoma.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2025Article
- Optimizing Skin Cancer Survival Prediction with Ensemble Techniques.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Editorial: Complexity of tumor microenvironment: A major culprit in cancer development, volume II.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Abundant evidence has indicated that the prognosis of cutaneous melanoma (CM) patients is highly complicated by the tumour immune microenvironment. We retrieved the clinical data and gene expression data of CM patients in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database for modelling and validation analysis. Based on single-sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA) and consensus clustering analysis, CM patients were classified into three immune level groups, and the differences in the tumour immune microenvironment and clinical characteristics were evaluated. Seven immune-related CM prognostic molecules, including three mRNAs (SUCO, BTN3A1 and TBC1D2), three lncRNAs (HLA-DQB1-AS1, C9orf139 and C22orf34) and one miRNA (hsa-miR-17-5p), were screened by differential expression analysis, ceRNA network analysis, LASSO Cox regression analysis and univariate Cox regression analysis. Their biological functions were mainly concentrated in the phospholipid metabolic process, transcription regulator complex, protein serine/threonine kinase activity and MAPK signalling pathway. We established a novel prognostic model for CM integrating clinical variables and immune molecules that showed promising predictive performance demonstrated by receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC ≥ 0.74), providing a scientific basis for predicting the prognosis and improving the clinical outcomes of CM patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.