Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36437208›Full record

ArticleVaccine2023

Vaccine hesitancy educational tools for healthcare providers and trainees: A scoping review.

A Lip, M Pateman, M M Fullerton, H M Chen, L Bailey, S Houle, S Davidson, C Constantinescu

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06489236 (Effectiveness of an Intervention on Vaccine Hesitancy Among Pediatric Nurses and Pediatricians), which is not on this map. Cited by 45 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06489236 nacompletednot on this map

Effectiveness of an Intervention on Vaccine Hesitancy Among Pediatric Nurses and Pediatricians: A Mixed Methods Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorFundació Institut de Recerca de l'Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant PauRan2023 to 2024Enrolled142ConditionsVaccination Hesitancy, Pediatric ALL, Presumptive Communication, Motivational InterviewingArmsVaccine Confidence: Skills to Promote Vaccination in the Pediatric Consultations
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

A LipDivision of Respirology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Electronic address: alip@qmed.ca.
M PatemanFaculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; 19 to Zero Inc., Rocky Mountain House, Alberta, Canada.
M M FullertonFaculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; 19 to Zero Inc., Rocky Mountain House, Alberta, Canada.
H M Chen19 to Zero Inc., Rocky Mountain House, Alberta, Canada.
L BaileySchool of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
S HouleSchool of Pharmacy, Faculty of Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
S DavidsonFaculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
C ConstantinescuDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
University of Calgary · CAUniversity of Ottawa · CAUniversity of Toronto · CAUniversity of Waterloo · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the era of vaccine hesitancy, highlighted by the current SARS-CoV2 pandemic, there is an acute need to develop an approach to reduce and address apprehension towards vaccinations. We sought to map and present an overview of existing educational interventions for healthcare providers (HCPs) on strategies to engage in effective vaccine discussion. We applied the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology framework in this scoping review. We searched five relevant databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycInfo, and SCOPUS) and grey literature through the Google search engine using keywords and subject headings that were systematically identified. We identified 3384 citations in peer-reviewed literature and 41 citations in grey literature. After screening for our inclusion criteria, we included 28 citations from peer reviewed literature and 16 citations from grey literature for analysis. We identified a total of 41 unique education interventions. Interventions were available from multiple disciplines, training levels, clinical settings, and diseases/vaccines. Interventions predominantly centered around two foci: knowledge sharing and communication training. Most interventions identified from peer-reviewed literature were facilitated and were applied with multiple modes of delivery. Interventions from grey literature were more topical and generally self-directed. We identified several gaps in knowledge. Firstly, accessibility and generalizability of interventions was limited. Secondly, distribution of interventions did not adequately address nursing and pharmacy disciplines, and did not cover the breadth of medical specialties for whom vaccine discussions apply. Thirdly, no interventions addressed self monitoring and the clinicians' recognition and management of emotions during difficult conversations. There is a need to address this gap and provide available, credible and comprehensive educational interventions that will support our healthcare providers in effective communication with vaccine hesitant patients.

Indexed as

COVID-19VaccinesHealth PersonnelHumansRNA, ViralSARS-CoV-2Vaccination HesitancyRNA, ViralVaccinesCommunicationEducationHealthcare ProvidersMultidisciplinaryVaccineVaccine Hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID36437208
PMCPMC9688224
OpenAlexW4309971344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.