Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36436912›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of reproduction and development2023

The large cytoplasmic volume of oocyte.

Hirohisa Kyogoku, Tomoya S Kitajima

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of reproduction and development, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Addition of granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) duringThe Journal of reproduction and development · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hirohisa KyogokuGraduate School of Agricultural Science, Kobe University, Kobe 657-8501, Japan.
Tomoya S KitajimaLaboratory for Chromosome Segregation, RIKEN Center for Biosystems Dynamics Research, Kobe 650-0047, Japan.
RIKEN Center for Biosystems Dynamics Research · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study of the size of cells and organelles has a long history, dating back to the 1600s when cells were defined. In particular, various methods have elucidated the size of the nucleus and the mitotic spindle in several species. However, little research has been conducted on oocyte size and organelles in mammals, and many questions remain to be answered. The appropriate size is essential to cell function properly. Oocytes have a very large cytoplasm, which is more than 100 times larger than that of general somatic cells in mammals. In this review, we discuss how oocytes acquire an enormous cytoplasmic size and the adverse effects of a large cytoplasmic size on cellular functions.

Indexed as

MeiosisOocytesAnimalsCytoplasmMammalsSpindle ApparatusOocyteScalingSizeSpindleSpindle assembly checkpoint (SAC)

Identifiers

PMID36436912
PMCPMC9939283
OpenAlexW4310335880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.