Observational studyESC heart failure2023
Prognostic value of plasma sAXL in patients with heart failure: insights from the DRAGON-HF trial.
Observational study in ESC heart failure, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03727828 (Diagnostic, Risk Stratification and Prognostic Value of Novel Biomarkers in Patients With Heart Failure), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Diagnostic, Risk Stratification and Prognostic Value of Novel Biomarkers in Patients With Heart Failure: DRAGON-HF Study
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Detection of Gas6/AXL complex and its expression changes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Prognostic Value of Soluble AXL in Serum from Heart Failure Patients with Preserved and Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
- Prognostic value of plasma sAXL in patients with heart failure: insights from the DRAGON-HF trial.ESC heart failure · 2023Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLittle is known about the predictive value of soluble AXL (sAXL) in heart failure (HF). This study aimed to describe the prognostic value of plasma sAXL in patients with symptomatic HF.
methodsThis is a multicentre observational prospective cohort study (Registration No. NCT03727828). Plasma sAXL were measured on admission. The primary endpoint is a composite of cardiovascular mortality and HF rehospitalization. Associations between plasma sAXL levels and clinical endpoints are described using Cox regression models and Kaplan-Meier methods.
resultsA total of 1030 symptomatic HF patients were enrolled in the study; the mean age (65% men) was 71 ± 12 years, with a median follow-up of 32 months (IQR: 26-41 months). The mean baseline sAXL levels were 20.03 ± 6.74 ng/mL. Plasma sAXL positively associated with NYHA classification and negatively associated with left ventricular ejection fraction (both P < 0.001). Cox regression showed that 1-SD increment of sAXL was associated with primary endpoint [HR (CI): 1.128 (1.024-1.242)], cardiovascular mortality [1.112 (1.032-1.198)], all-cause mortality [1.142 (1.057-1.234)], and HF rehospitalization [1.122 (1.030-1.224)] after adjustment for potential confounders including NT-proBNP. Kaplan-Meier curves revealed that patients with the highest sAXL levels were at the highest risk of primary endpoint events, cardiovascular mortality, and all-cause mortality (all P values < 0.001). Furthermore, both Kaplan-Meier method and Categorical analysis demonstrated that the combined use of sAXL and NT-proBNP were more likely to predict all-cause or cardiovascular mortality (both P < 0.001). Similar results were observed when separating patients with respect to left ventricular ejection fraction, namely, in HFrEF, HFmrEF, and HFpEF groups.
conclusionsPlasma sAXL concentrations are of great importance in predicting clinical outcomes in HF patients, independent of NT-proBNP, suggesting that sAXL is a promising prognostic marker for further study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.