Observational studyThe Lancet. Haematology2023
A sex-informed approach to improve the personalised decision making process in myelodysplastic syndromes: a multicentre, observational cohort study.
Observational study in The Lancet. Haematology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04889729 (Genomic and Personalized Medicine for All), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Genomic and Personalized Medicine for All (GENOMED4ALL): Application of Artificial Intelligence to Improve Disease Classification and Prognosis in Myelodysplastic Syndrome.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Challenges and Potential Solutions to Advance Global Cancer Drug Development.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2026Review
- Gender influences prognosis of classical BCR::ABL1 negative myeloproliferative neoplasms: a retrospective cohort study.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Disparities in real-world treatment patterns of hypomethylating agents among patients with MDS in the United States.Blood neoplasia · 2025Article
- Myelodysplastic syndromes: Updates on Genomic Landscape, Molecular Subtypes, & Targeted Therapies.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2025Review
- Article
- Progress in the Genetics of Myelodysplastic Syndromes with a Latin American Perspective.Genes · 2025Review
- How I treat higher-risk MDS.Blood · 2025Review
- Network-based clustering unveils interconnected landscapes of genomic and clinical features across myeloid malignancies.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Acute myeloid leukemia: does sex matter?Leukemia · 2024Review
- Gut Microbiota Composition Correlates with Disease Severity in Myelodysplastic Syndrome.International journal of hematology-oncology and stem cell research · 2024Article
- Age and sex associate with outcome in older AML and high risk MDS patients treated with 10-day decitabine.Blood cancer journal · 2023Article
- Sex Disparities in Myelodysplastic Syndromes: Genotype, Phenotype, and Outcomes.Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
1 author at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSex is a major source of diversity among patients and a sex-informed approach is becoming a new paradigm in precision medicine. We aimed to describe sex diversity in myelodysplastic syndromes in terms of disease genotype, phenotype, and clinical outcome. Moreover, we sought to incorporate sex information into the clinical decision-making process as a fundamental component of patient individuality.
methodsIn this multicentre, observational cohort study, we retrospectively analysed 13 284 patients aged 18 years or older with a diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndrome according to 2016 WHO criteria included in the EuroMDS network (n=2025), International Working Group for Prognosis in MDS (IWG-PM; n=2387), the Spanish Group of Myelodysplastic Syndromes registry (GESMD; n=7687), or the Düsseldorf MDS registry (n=1185). Recruitment periods for these cohorts were between 1990 and 2016. The correlation between sex and genomic features was analysed in the EuroMDS cohort and validated in the IWG-PM cohort. The effect of sex on clinical outcome, with overall survival as the main endpoint, was analysed in the EuroMDS population and validated in the other three cohorts. Finally, novel prognostic models incorporating sex and genomic information were built and validated, and compared to the widely used revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04889729.
findingsThe study included 7792 (58·7%) men and 5492 (41·3%) women. 10 906 (82·1%) patients were White, and race was not reported for 2378 (17·9%) patients. Sex biases were observed at the single-gene level with mutations in seven genes enriched in men (ASXL1, SRSF2, and ZRSR2 p<0·0001 in both cohorts; DDX41 not available in the EuroMDS cohort vs p=0·0062 in the IWG-PM cohort; IDH2 p<0·0001 in EuroMDS vs p=0·042 in IWG-PM; TET2 p=0·031 vs p=0·035; U2AF1 p=0·033 vs p<0·0001) and mutations in two genes were enriched in women (DNMT3A p<0·0001 in EuroMDS vs p=0·011 in IWG-PM; TP53 p=0·030 vs p=0·037). Additionally, sex biases were observed in co-mutational pathways of founding genomic lesions (splicing-related genes, predominantly in men, p<0·0001 in both the EuroMDS and IWG-PM cohorts), in DNA methylation (predominantly in men, p=0·046 in EuroMDS vs p<0·0001 in IWG-PM), and TP53 mutational pathways (predominantly in women, p=0·0073 in EuroMDS vs p<0·0001 in IWG-PM). In the retrospective EuroMDS cohort, men had worse median overall survival (81·3 months, 95% CI 70·4-95·0 in men vs 123·5 months, 104·5-127·5 in women; hazard ratio [HR] 1·40, 95% CI 1·26-1·52; p<0·0001). This result was confirmed in the prospective validation cohorts (median overall survival was 54·7 months, 95% CI 52·4-59·1 in men vs 74·4 months, 69·3-81·2 in women; HR 1·30, 95% CI 1·23-1·35; p<0·0001 in the GEMSD MDS registry; 40·0 months, 95% CI 33·4-43·7 in men vs 54·2 months, 38·6-63·8 in women; HR 1·23, 95% CI 1·08-1·36; p<0·0001 in the Dusseldorf MDS registry). We developed new personalised prognostic tools that included sex information (the sex-informed prognostic scoring system and the sex-informed genomic scoring system). Sex maintained independent prognostic power in all prognostic systems; the highest performance was observed in the model that included both sex and genomic information. A five-to-five mapping between the IPSS-R and new score categories resulted in the re-stratification of 871 (43·0%) of 2025 patients from the EuroMDS cohort and 1003 (42·0%) of 2387 patients from the IWG-PM cohort by using the sex-informed prognostic scoring system, and of 1134 (56·0%) patients from the EuroMDS cohort and 1265 (53·0%) patients from the IWG-PM cohort by using the sex-informed genomic scoring system. We created a web portal that enables outcome predictions based on a sex-informed personalised approach.
interpretationOur results suggest that a sex-informed approach can improve the personalised decision making process in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes and should be considered in the design of clinical trials including low-risk patients.
fundingEuropean Union (Horizon 2020 and Transcan programs), Italian Association for Cancer Research, Italian Ministry of Health, and Italian Ministry of University and Research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.