Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36436541›Full record

Trial reportThe Lancet. Child & adolescent health2023

Direct versus video laryngoscopy with standard blades for neonatal and infant tracheal intubation with supplemental oxygen: a multicentre, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial.

Thomas Riva, Thomas Engelhardt, Reto Basciani, Rachele Bonfiglio, Evelien Cools, Alexander Fuchs, Annery G Garcia-Marcinkiewicz, Robert Greif, Walid Habre, Markus Huber and 6 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter StudyEquivalence Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Lancet. Child & adolescent health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 36 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
16.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06898801 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Neonatal INtubation After "Just-in-time" Audiovisual Training: a Randomised Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity College DublinRan2025 to 2027Enrolled140ConditionsRespiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn, Endotracheal Intubation, Neonatal Intubation Performance, PrematurityArmsJust-in-time video training
NCT07426016 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Randomized Controlled Trial of Video-Laryngoscopy Intervention or Direct Laryngoscopy for Delivery of Less Invasive Surfactant Administration for Premature Infants

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterRan2026 to 2028Enrolled100ConditionsRespiratory Distress Syndrome (Neonatal), Surfactant Deficiency Syndrome NeonatalArmsVideo Laryngoscopy, Direct Laryngoscopy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Observational
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 12 institutions in 6 countries.

Thomas RivaDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Thomas EngelhardtDepartment of Anaesthesia, Montreal Children's Hospital, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Reto BascianiDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Kantonsspital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland.
Rachele BonfiglioUnit for Research in Anaesthesia, Department of Paediatric Anaesthesia, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genova, Italy.
Evelien CoolsUnit for Anaesthesiological Investigations, Department of Anaesthesiology, Pharmacology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals and University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Alexander FuchsDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Annery G Garcia-MarcinkiewiczDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Robert GreifSchool of Medicine, Sigmund Freud University Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Walid HabreUnit for Anaesthesiological Investigations, Department of Anaesthesiology, Pharmacology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals and University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Markus HuberDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Maria-Alexandra PetreDepartment of Anaesthesia, Montreal Children's Hospital, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Britta S von Ungern-SternbergDepartment of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, Perth Children's Hospital, Perth, Australia; Division of Emergency Medicine, Anaesthesia and Pain Medicine, Medical School, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia; Perioperative Medicine Team, Telethon Kids Institute, Perth, Australia.
David SommerfieldDepartment of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, Perth Children's Hospital, Perth, Australia; Division of Emergency Medicine, Anaesthesia and Pain Medicine, Medical School, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia; Perioperative Medicine Team, Telethon Kids Institute, Perth, Australia.
Lorenz TheilerDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Kantonsspital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland.
Nicola DismaUnit for Research in Anaesthesia, Department of Paediatric Anaesthesia, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genova, Italy. Electronic address: nicoladisma@gaslini.org.
OPTIMISE Collaboration
University of Bern · CHKantonsspital Aarau · CHUniversity of Western Australia · AUChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia · USIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITIstituto Giannina Gaslini · ITMcGill University Health Centre · CAMontreal Children's Hospital · CASigmund Freud University Vienna · ATThe Kids Research Institute Australia · AUUniversity Hospital of Geneva · CHUniversity of Geneva · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTracheal intubation in neonates and infants is a potentially life-saving procedure. Video laryngoscopy has been found to improve first-attempt tracheal intubation success and reduce complications compared with direct laryngoscopy in children younger than 12 months. Supplemental periprocedural oxygen might increase the likelihood of successful first-attempt intubation because of an increase in safe apnoea time. We tested the hypothesis that direct laryngoscopy is not inferior to video laryngoscopy when using standard blades and supplemental oxygen is provided.

methodsWe did a non-inferiority, international, multicentre, single-blinded, randomised controlled trial, in which we randomly assigned neonates and infants aged up to 52 weeks postmenstrual age scheduled for elective tracheal intubation to either direct laryngoscopy or video laryngoscopy (1:1 ratio, randomly assigned using a secure online service) at seven tertiary paediatric hospitals across Australia, Canada, Italy, Switzerland, and the USA. An expected difficult intubation was the main exclusion criteria. Parents and patients were masked to the assigned group of treatment. All infants received supplemental oxygen (1 L/Kg per min) during laryngoscopy until the correct tracheal tube position was confirmed. The primary outcome was the proportion of first-attempt tracheal intubation success, defined as appearance of end-tidal CO

findingsOf 599 patients assessed, 250 patients were included between Oct 26, 2020, and March 11, 2022. 244 patients were included in the final modified intention-to-treat analysis. The median postmenstrual age on the day of intubation was 44·0 weeks (IQR 41·0-48·0) in the direct laryngoscopy group and 46·0 weeks (42·0-49·0) in the video laryngoscopy group, 34 (28%) were female in the direct laryngoscopy group and 38 (31%) were female in the video laryngoscopy group. First-attempt tracheal intubation success rate with no desaturation was higher with video laryngoscopy (89·3% [95% CI 83·7 to 94·8]; n=108/121) compared with direct laryngoscopy (78·9% [71·6 to 86·1]; n=97/123), with an adjusted absolute risk difference of 9·5% (0·8 to 18·1; p=0·033). The incidence of adverse events between the two groups was similar (-2·5% [95% CI -9·6 to 4·6]; p=0·490). Post-anaesthesia complications occurred seven times in six patients with no difference between the groups.

interpretationVideo laryngoscopy with standard blades in combination with supplemental oxygen in neonates and infants might increase the success rate of first-attempt tracheal intubation, when compared with direct laryngoscopy with supplemental oxygen. The incidence of hypoxaemia increased with the number of attempts, but was similar between video laryngoscopy and direct laryngoscopy. Video laryngoscopy with oxygen should be considered as the technique of choice when neonates and infants are intubated.

fundingSwiss Pediatric Anaesthesia Society, Swiss Society for Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Foundation for Research in Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Channel 7 Telethon Trust, Stan Perron Charitable Foundation, National Health and Medical Research Council.

Indexed as

LaryngoscopesLaryngoscopyChildCritical CareFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornIntubation, IntratrachealMaleOxygenOxygen

Identifiers

PMID36436541
OpenAlexW4309951205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.