Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36436538›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet. Microbe2023

Monitoring monkeypox virus in saliva and air samples in Spain: a cross-sectional study.

Bruno Hernaez, Ana Muñoz-Gómez, Africa Sanchiz, Eva Orviz, Adrian Valls-Carbo, Iñigo Sagastagoitia, Oskar Ayerdi, Rocío Martín, Teresa Puerta, Mar Vera and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet. Microbe, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Mpox Airborne Transmission: A Systematic Review.Reviews in medical virology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Shotgun metagenomics on indoor air for surveillance of respiratory, enteric, and skin viruses in a Belgian daycare setting, January to December 2022.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2025
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Bruno HernaezCentro de Biología Molecular Severo Ochoa (Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas and Universidad Autónoma de Madrid), Madrid, Spain.
Ana Muñoz-GómezCentro Sandoval and Hospital Universitario Clínico de San Carlos, IdISSC, Madrid, Spain.
Africa SanchizCentro de Biología Molecular Severo Ochoa (Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas and Universidad Autónoma de Madrid), Madrid, Spain.
Eva OrvizCentro Sandoval and Hospital Universitario Clínico de San Carlos, IdISSC, Madrid, Spain.
Adrian Valls-CarboInstituto de Investigación Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain.
Iñigo SagastagoitiaCentro Sandoval and Hospital Universitario Clínico de San Carlos, IdISSC, Madrid, Spain; Ciber de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Madrid, Spain.
Oskar AyerdiCentro Sandoval and Hospital Universitario Clínico de San Carlos, IdISSC, Madrid, Spain.
Rocío MartínCentro de Biología Molecular Severo Ochoa (Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas and Universidad Autónoma de Madrid), Madrid, Spain.
Teresa PuertaCentro Sandoval and Hospital Universitario Clínico de San Carlos, IdISSC, Madrid, Spain.
Mar VeraCentro Sandoval and Hospital Universitario Clínico de San Carlos, IdISSC, Madrid, Spain.
Noemi CabelloCentro Sandoval and Hospital Universitario Clínico de San Carlos, IdISSC, Madrid, Spain; Ciber de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Madrid, Spain.
Jorge VergasCentro Sandoval and Hospital Universitario Clínico de San Carlos, IdISSC, Madrid, Spain.
Cristina PrietoInstituto de Agroquímica y Tecnología de Alimentos, Valencia, Spain.
María Pardo-FiguerezInstituto de Agroquímica y Tecnología de Alimentos, Valencia, Spain.
Anabel NegredoCiber de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Madrid, Spain; Laboratorio de Arbovirus y Enfermedades Víricas Importadas, Centro Nacional de Microbiología, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
José María LagarónInstituto de Agroquímica y Tecnología de Alimentos, Valencia, Spain.
Jorge Del RomeroCentro Sandoval and Hospital Universitario Clínico de San Carlos, IdISSC, Madrid, Spain.
Vicente EstradaCentro Sandoval and Hospital Universitario Clínico de San Carlos, IdISSC, Madrid, Spain; Ciber de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Madrid, Spain. Electronic address: vicente.estrada@salud.madrid.org.
Antonio AlcamíCentro de Biología Molecular Severo Ochoa (Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas and Universidad Autónoma de Madrid), Madrid, Spain. Electronic address: aalcami@cbm.csic.es.
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos · ESHospital Clínico San Carlos · ESConsejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas · ESInstituto de Agroquímica y Tecnología de Alimentos · ESCentro Nacional de Microbiologia · ESInstitut d'Investigació en Ciències de la Salut Germans Trias i Pujol · ESUniversidad Autónoma de Madrid · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe transmission of monkeypox virus occurs through direct contact, but transmission through saliva or exhaled droplets and aerosols has not yet been investigated. We aimed to assess the presence of monkeypox virus DNA and infectious virus in saliva samples and droplets and aerosols exhaled from patients infected with monkeypox virus.

methodsWe did a cross-sectional study in patients with monkeypox confirmed by PCR who attended two health centres in Madrid, Spain. For each patient, we collected samples of saliva, exhaled droplets within a mask, and aerosols captured by air filtration through newly developed nanofiber filters. We evaluated the presence of monkeypox virus in the samples by viral DNA detection by quantitative PCR (qPCR) and isolation of infectious viruses in cell cultures.

findingsBetween May 18 and July 15, 2022, 44 patients with symptomatic monkeypox attended two health centres in Madrid and were included in the study. All were cisgender men, with a median age of 35·0 years (IQR 11·3). We identified high loads of monkeypox virus DNA by qPCR in 35 (85%) of 41 saliva samples. Infectious monkeypox virus was recovered from 22 (67%) of 33 saliva samples positive for monkeypox virus DNA. We also found a significant association between the number of affected cutaneous areas or general symptoms and the viral load present in saliva samples. Droplets exhaled from patients with monkeypox, detected inside a mask, contained monkeypox virus DNA in 32 (71%) of 45 samples, with two of the 32 positive samples showing the presence of the infectious virus. Monkeypox virus DNA in aerosols, collected from the medical consultation room, were detected in 27 (64%) of 42 samples, despite patients wearing an FFP2 mask during the visit. Infectious virus was not recovered from aerosol samples. High levels of monkeypox virus DNA were identified in aerosols collected from a hospital isolation room housing a patient with monkeypox.

interpretationThe identification of high viable monkeypox virus loads in saliva in most patients with monkeypox and the finding of monkeypox virus DNA in droplets and aerosols warrants further epidemiological studies to evaluate the potential relevance of the respiratory route of infection in the 2022 monkeypox virus outbreak.

fundingEU, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and Ciberinfec.

Indexed as

Monkeypox virusMpox, MonkeypoxAerosolsChildCross-Sectional StudiesDNAHumansMaleSalivaSpainAerosolsDNA

Identifiers

PMID36436538
PMCPMC9691259
OpenAlexW4310080629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.