Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36436192›Full record

SynthesisConservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology2023

A systematic review of snake translocations to identify potential tactics for reducing postrelease effects.

Jonathan D Choquette, Jacqueline D Litzgus, Joanne X Y Gui, Trevor E Pitcher

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A systematic review of snake translocations to identify potential tactics for reducing postrelease effects.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jonathan D ChoquetteSchool of Natural Sciences, Laurentian University, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9965-4359
Jacqueline D LitzgusSchool of Natural Sciences, Laurentian University, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada.
Joanne X Y GuiWildlife Preservation Canada, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Trevor E PitcherGreat Lakes Institute for Environmental Research & Department of Integrative Biology, University of Windsor, Windsor, Ontario, Canada.
Laurentian University · CAUniversity of Windsor · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advancements in the field of reintroduction biology are needed, but understanding of how to effectively conduct translocations, particularly with snakes, is lacking. We conducted a systematic review of snake translocation studies to identify potential tactics for reducing postrelease effects. We included studies on intentional, human-mediated, wild-wild, or captive-wild translocations to any location, regardless of motive or number of snakes translocated. Only studies that presented results for at least 1 of 4 outcomes (movement behavior, site fidelity, survival, or population establishment) were included. We systematically searched 4 databases for published studies and used 5 methods to search the gray literature. Our search and screening criteria yielded 121 data sources, representing 130 translocation cases. We quantified the association between 15 translocation tactics and short-term translocation outcomes by calculating odds ratios and used forest plots to display results. Snake translocations involved 47 species (from mainly 2 families), and most were motivated by research, were monitored for at least 6 months, occurred in North America, and took place from the 1990s onward. The odds of a positive snake translocation outcome were highest with release of captive reared or juvenile snakes, release of social groups together, delayed release, provision of environmental enrichment or social housing before release, or minimization of distance translocated. The odds of a positive outcome were lowest when snakes were released early in their active season. Our results do not demonstrate causation, but outcomes of snake translocation were associated with 8 tactics (4 of which were strongly correlated). In addition to targeted comparative studies, we recommend practitioners consider the possible influence of these tactics when planning snake translocations.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesSnakesAnimalsNorth Americaaumento poblacionaldesplazamientodisplacementhead startinginicio ventajosopopulation augmentationrelocationrepatriaciónrepatriationreptilreptilerescate de serpientesreubicaciónsnake rescuetransplantationtrasplante爬行动物, 迁地, 强制迁移, 重新安置, 遣返, 增加种群, 有利开端, 蛇类救援

Identifiers

PMID36436192
PMCPMC10100070
OpenAlexW4310004231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.