ArticleInternational ophthalmology2023
Global trends and prospects in research of artificial cornea over past 20 years: a bibliometric and visualized analysis.
Article in International ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Bibliometric and visualized analysis of research hotpots and future prospects in lacrimal duct obstruction disease (1900 to 2024).International journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMany studies have been focused on the area of the artificial cornea. In our study, a bibliometric analysis was performed on the artificial cornea to identify the global key research fields and trends over the past 20 years.
methodsPublications about artificial cornea were retrieved and downloaded from the Web of Science Core Collection from 2002 to 2021. CiteSpace and VOSviewer were used to analyze countries, institutions, authors, and related research areas.
resultsA total of 829 eligible publications were analyzed. The USA was the most productive country for the artificial cornea, followed by China and Canada. Harvard University was the most prolific institution in this field. Cornea published most of the studies in this area and Dohlman CH was the most cited author.
conclusionsBibliometric analysis in our study first provides a general perspective on the artificial cornea, which can be helpful to further explore the issues in the rapidly developing area.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36436171What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.