ArticleSpine deformity2023
Reliability and validity of an adapted Saudi Arabic version of scoliosis research society outcomes questionnaire (SRS-30) in Saudi Arabia.
Article in Spine deformity, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo perform a cross-cultural adaptation and validation of Saudi Arabic (SA) version of SRS-30 and test it on Saudi patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).
methodsA retrospective analysis of prospective collected data of 322 patients with AIS. The cross-cultural adaptation process was performed using the American Association of Orthopedic Surgeons (AAOS) Outcomes Committee method. A pre-test analysis was conducted on 30 patients. All patients had completed the SRS-22r and SF-12 preoperatively and 198 patients had completed the SA version of SRS-30 and SF-12 postoperatively twice at six weeks interval. The validity and internal consistency were tested using the interclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Cronbach alpha, person correlation coefficient, and confidence interval (CI).
resultsThere are 288 (89.4%) girls and 34 (10.6%) boys and the average age is 15 ± 2.3 years (range from 10-21 years). The majority of patients have a Lenke type 1 curve (41%) and only 14% have a Lenke type 5 and 6. The overall Cronbach alpha (CA) of all SRS-30 domains is 0.87. However, the Cronbach alpha for the satisfaction, and function domains slightly lower than the original English questionnaire.
conclusionThe Saudi Arabic version of SRS-30 is a reliable and valid instrument and can be applied to evaluate the quality of life in patients with AIS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36436116What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.