ReviewJournal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology2022
The chemical landscape of high-throughput new approach methodologies for exposure.
Review in Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Advances in ecotoxicological research using planarians: a comprehensive review.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2026Review
- Characterizing Prenatal Exposure to Contemporary and Emerging Chemicals in a Prospective Cohort of Pregnant Women in Atlanta, Georgia.Environment & health (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Article
- Uncertainty-aware machine learning to predict non-cancer human toxicity for the global chemicals market.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Evaluations of Sex Differences in Dosimetry in Rats Following Perfluorohexanesulfonamide (PFHxSA) Oral Exposure.Toxics · 2025Article
- Identifying Gene Predictors of Chemicals Linked With Breast Cancer: A Machine Learning Analysis of MCF7 Cellular Transcriptomic Screening Data.Environmental and molecular mutagenesis · 2025Article
- Six principles of exposure science: inspiring solutions that foster healthy environments.Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2025Article
- Prioritizing Chemical Candidates from Non-targeted Analysis Using Metadata, Spectral Similarity, and Hazard Scoring within INTERPRET NTA.Analytical chemistry · 2025Article
- Examining the effects of analytical replication on data quality in a non-targeted analysis experiment.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2025Article
- Automated QA/QC reporting for non-targeted analysis: a demonstration of "INTERPRET NTA" with de facto water reuse data.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2025Article
- Article
- Seminar: Functional Exposomics and Mechanisms of Toxicity-Insights from Model Systems and NAMs.Environmental health perspectives · 2024Review
- High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry for Human Exposomics: Expanding Chemical Space Coverage.Environmental science & technology · 2024Review
- Effects of Chemicals in Reporter Gene Bioassays with Different Metabolic Activities Compared to Baseline Toxicity.Chemical research in toxicology · 2024Article
- Probabilistic Reference and 10% Effect Concentrations for Characterizing Inhalation Non-cancer and Developmental/Reproductive Effects for 2,160 Substances.Environmental science & technology · 2024Article
- Gene Target Prediction of Environmental Chemicals Using Coupled Matrix-Matrix Completion.Environmental science & technology · 2024Article
- Suspect Screening Analysis of Pooled Human Serum Samples Using GC × GC/TOF-MS.Environmental science & technology · 2024Article
- Characterizing Chemical Exposure Trends from NHANES Urinary Biomonitoring Data.Environmental health perspectives · 2024Article
- Quantitative Structure Use Relationships: Highlights from a technical summit meeting.Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP · 2023Article
- Identification of neurotoxicology (NT)/developmental neurotoxicology (DNT) adverse outcome pathways and key event linkages with in vitro DNT screening assays.Neurotoxicology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The rapid characterization of risk to humans and ecosystems from exogenous chemicals requires information on both hazard and exposure. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's ToxCast program and the interagency Tox21 initiative have screened thousands of chemicals in various high-throughput (HT) assay systems for in vitro bioactivity. EPA's ExpoCast program is developing complementary HT methods for characterizing the human and ecological exposures necessary to interpret HT hazard data in a real-world risk context. These new approach methodologies (NAMs) for exposure include computational and analytical tools for characterizing multiple components of the complex pathways chemicals take from their source to human and ecological receptors. Here, we analyze the landscape of exposure NAMs developed in ExpoCast in the context of various chemical lists of scientific and regulatory interest, including the ToxCast and Tox21 libraries and the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) inventory. We examine the landscape of traditional and exposure NAM data covering chemical use, emission, environmental fate, toxicokinetics, and ultimately external and internal exposure. We consider new chemical descriptors, machine learning models that draw inferences from existing data, high-throughput exposure models, statistical frameworks that integrate multiple model predictions, and non-targeted analytical screening methods that generate new HT monitoring information. We demonstrate that exposure NAMs drastically improve the coverage of the chemical landscape compared to traditional approaches and recommend a set of research activities to further expand the development of HT exposure data for application to risk characterization. Continuing to develop exposure NAMs to fill priority data gaps identified here will improve the availability and defensibility of risk-based metrics for use in chemical prioritization and screening. IMPACT: This analysis describes the current state of exposure assessment-based new approach methodologies across varied chemical landscapes and provides recommendations for filling key data gaps.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.