Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36435892›Full record

ArticleInsights into imaging2022

Deep learning image reconstruction algorithm for carotid dual-energy computed tomography angiography: evaluation of image quality and diagnostic performance.

Chenyu Jiang, Dan Jin, Zhuoheng Liu, Yan Zhang, Ming Ni, Huishu Yuan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insights into imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Systematic Review on Learning-based Spectral CT.IEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chenyu JiangDepartment of Radiology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Dan JinDepartment of Radiology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Zhuoheng LiuCT Research Center, GE Healthcare China, 1 South Tongji Road, Beijing, China.
Yan ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Ming NiDepartment of Radiology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Huishu YuanDepartment of Radiology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China. huishuy@sina.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5320-4360

Funding

Beijing New Health Industry Development Foundation XM2020-02-006National Natural Science Foundation of China 82171927
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate image quality and diagnostic performance of carotid dual-energy computed tomography angiography (DECTA) using deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) compared with images using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-Veo (ASIR-V).

methodsCarotid DECTA datasets of 28 consecutive patients were reconstructed at 50 keV using DLIR at low, medium, and high levels (DLIR-L, DLIR-M, and DLIR-H) and 80% ASIR-V algorithms. Mean attenuation, image noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) at different levels of arteries were measured and calculated. Image quality for noise and texture, depiction of arteries, and diagnostic performance toward carotid plaques were assessed subjectively by two radiologists. Quantitative and qualitative parameters were compared between the ASIR-V, DLIR-L, DLIR-M, and DLIR-H groups.

resultsThe image noise at aorta and common carotid artery, SNR, and CNR at all level arteries of DLIR-H images were significantly higher than those of ASIR-V images (p = 0.000-0.040). The quantitative analysis of DLIR-L and DLIR-M showed comparable denoise capability with ASIR-V. The overall image quality (p = 0.000) and image noise (p = 0.000-0.014) were significantly better in the DLIR-M and DLIR-H images. The image texture was improved by DLR at all level compared to ASIR-V images (p = 0.000-0.008). Depictions of head and neck arteries and diagnostic performance were comparable between four groups (p > 0.05).

conclusionsCompared with 80% ASIR-V, we recommend DLIR-H for clinical carotid DECTA reconstruction, which can significantly improve the image quality of carotid DECTA at 50 keV but maintain a desirable diagnostic performance and arterial depiction.

Indexed as

Deep learningDual-energy computed tomographyImage reconstruction

Identifiers

PMID36435892
PMCPMC9701290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.